Author
Listed:
- Moataz Mahmoud
(Department of Information Systems, School of Business, Law, Humanities and Pathways, Toowoomba Campus, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, QLD 4350, Australia)
- Ka Ching Chan
(Department of Information Systems, School of Business, Law, Humanities and Pathways, Toowoomba Campus, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, QLD 4350, Australia)
- Mustafa Ally
(Department of Information Systems, School of Business, Law, Humanities and Pathways, Toowoomba Campus, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, QLD 4350, Australia)
Abstract
This systematic review examines how organisational resilience is conceptualised, enacted, and enabled in the Digital Age, characterised by Artificial Intelligence (AI), Generative AI, the Internet of Things (IoT), Big Data, and Robotics. Despite their transformative potential, these technologies are often treated as peripheral tools rather than core mechanisms in resilience architectures. Adopting a critical realist paradigm, we conducted a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) following the PRISMA 2020 protocol to review thirty (30) peer-reviewed empirical studies (2017–present). A pre-SLR conceptual framework, linking Business Intelligence and Responsiveness constructs, guided data extraction and synthesis. Building on this, we propose a conceptual framework and explanatory model grounded in the Context–Mechanism–Outcome logic. The model distinguishes generative mechanisms (real domain), organisational responses (actual domain), and observable indicators (empirical domain). The review identifies Collective Capability (CC), Adaptive Capability (AC) and Dynamic Capability (DC) mechanisms as key generative powers, with Digital Age enablers embedded within Adaptive Capability (AC) and Dynamic Capability (DC). Together, these mechanisms contribute to Systemic Preparedness (SP), Rapid Recovery (RR) and Generative Stability (GS), thereby supporting the emergence of Organisational Resilience (OR). This reconceptualises resilience as an emergent, non-linear outcome of mechanism interactions, offering a unified direction. Future research should prioritise longitudinal multi-case studies and quantitative testing of Context–Mechanism–Outcome configurations, supported by mixed-method designs to validate and refine the proposed framework.
Suggested Citation
Moataz Mahmoud & Ka Ching Chan & Mustafa Ally, 2026.
"Uncovering the Mechanisms of Organisational Resilience: A Critical Realist Systematic Review,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-51, May.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:10:p:5003-:d:1944178
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:10:p:5003-:d:1944178. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.