Author
Listed:
- Jin Ran
(School of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830017, China
Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Green Construction and Smart Traffic Control of Transportation Infrastructure, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830017, China)
- Wenzheng Zhao
(School of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830017, China)
- Meiling Li
(School of Traffic Engineering, Shandong Jianzhu University, Jinan 250101, China)
- Dong Tang
(School of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830017, China
Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Green Construction and Smart Traffic Control of Transportation Infrastructure, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830017, China)
- Yanyan Zhang
(Shandong Transportation Institute, Jinan 250102, China)
- Reziwaguli Abula
(Sandaoling Branch, Hami Highway Administration Bureau, Hami 839009, China)
Abstract
During freeway reconstruction and expansion, median crossover sections where traffic is maintained during construction are vulnerable to changes in lane configuration, abrupt geometric changes, and construction interference. These factors may lead to safety risks and operational efficiency losses. Existing studies have mainly relied on microscopic traffic simulation to evaluate speed limit schemes, while engineering costs, environmental impacts, driver responses, and policy constraints have rarely been considered in an integrated manner. This study proposes a two-stage evaluation framework that integrates VISSIM microscopic traffic simulation, the Entropy Weight Method–Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution (EWM–TOPSIS), and the Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP). A four to eight-lane freeway expansion project in a plain area of northern China is used as the case study. Field speed data from a representative median crossover section are used for model calibration and speed-pattern analysis. A total of 27 simulation scenarios is then constructed by combining three bottleneck types, three traffic saturation levels, and three speed limit schemes. The EWM–TOPSIS results show that the 80→70 km/h scheme achieves the highest relative closeness in all scenarios. The FAHP evaluation, based on six criteria and 21 indicators, also ranks this scheme first. Its ranking remains unchanged under ±10% criteria weight perturbations. Field speed comparison indicates that vehicles exhibit a deceleration–recovery pattern when passing through the crossover opening. Overall, the 80→70 km/h gradual speed reduction scheme can be regarded as a candidate scheme for work zones with similar median crossover configurations. Under localized calibration conditions, it can provide decision-making support for reducing operational disturbances, fuel consumption, and external impacts associated with crash risk.
Suggested Citation
Jin Ran & Wenzheng Zhao & Meiling Li & Dong Tang & Yanyan Zhang & Reziwaguli Abula, 2026.
"Speed Limit Strategies for Median Crossover Sections in Freeway Reconstruction and Expansion: A Case Study of a Four-to-Eight-Lane Expansion Project in a Plain Area,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-26, May.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:10:p:4983-:d:1943801
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:10:p:4983-:d:1943801. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.