Author
Listed:
- Ao Li
(Key Laboratory of Urban Stormwater System and Water Environment, Ministry of Education, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing 102616, China)
- Tian Ma
(Key Laboratory of Urban Stormwater System and Water Environment, Ministry of Education, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing 102616, China)
- Shegang Shao
(Highway Traffic Environment Research Center, Research Institute of Highway, Ministry of Transport, Beijing 100088, China)
- Jing Zhao
(Highway Traffic Environment Research Center, Research Institute of Highway, Ministry of Transport, Beijing 100088, China)
- Xiaoran Zhang
(Key Laboratory of Urban Stormwater System and Water Environment, Ministry of Education, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing 102616, China)
Abstract
The pursuit of sustainable winter road maintenance has intensified the need for deicers that balance functional effectiveness, economic viability, and minimal environmental impact. However, the absence of a systematic, multi-dimensional evaluation framework has hindered informed product selection and green procurement. This study develops and validates the Comprehensive Deicer Multi-criteria Evaluation System (CDMES)—a structured assessment framework that integrates economic, functional, environmental, and infrastructural sustainability dimensions. The evaluation index system was constructed for deicers, consisting of 18 indicators including preparation cost, engineering maintenance cost, operability of agent preparation, application difficulty, asphalt binder adhesion loss, minimum application concentration, proportion of active ingredients, effective time, ambient temperature, freezing point, solid dissolution rate, relative snow/ice-melting capacity, seed damage rate, chlorophyll attenuation, soil pH, aqueous solution pH, steel–carbon corrosion rate, and pavement friction attenuation rate. Subsequently, the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) was employed to determine the weight of each indicator, and evaluation criteria were established in accordance with relevant standards and literature. Finally, this weight determination method, combined with the simple additive weighting (SAW) method for index aggregation, forms a quantitative evaluation model. These elements together constitute a comprehensive deicer evaluation system, designated as the Comprehensive Deicer Multi-criteria Evaluation System (CDMES). Validation using three representative deicers—sodium chloride, a composite chloride-based formulation, and an organic acetate-based product—demonstrated that the CDMES can effectively discriminate product performance across multiple sustainability dimensions and identify critical weaknesses that may be obscured by purely compensatory scoring. The framework offers a transparent and reproducible decision-support tool for winter maintenance managers seeking to align deicer selection with sustainability objectives.
Suggested Citation
Ao Li & Tian Ma & Shegang Shao & Jing Zhao & Xiaoran Zhang, 2026.
"A Comprehensive Multi-Criteria Evaluation System for Deicer Assessment: Framework Development and Validation,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-14, May.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:10:p:4917-:d:1942625
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:10:p:4917-:d:1942625. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.