IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i10p4878-d1941783.html

Research on Carbon Emission Reduction Cost Calculation and Path Optimization Based on Life-Cycle Assessment: A Case Study of China’s Steel Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Shishuang Shang

    (College of Science, North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan 063210, China)

  • Yongmei Qi

    (College of Artificial Intelligence, North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan 063210, China)

  • Jifang Zheng

    (College of Metallurgy and Energy, North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan 063210, China)

  • Ziye Liu

    (College of Science, North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan 063210, China)

  • Danping Wang

    (College of Science, North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan 063210, China)

Abstract

In order to balance carbon emissions and cost reduction in China’s steel firms, this study proposes a multi-objective optimization model for carbon emission reduction based on life-cycle assessment. The baseline scenario technique was used to forecast carbon emissions at every stage of the life cycle by 2025, and the costs of reduction for four major initiatives—clean electricity procurement, recycling of scrap steel, fossil fuel consumption reduction, and clean transportation share increase—were systematically accounted. Kernel PCA and NSGA-II algorithms were used to create a multi-objective optimization model with the goal of maximizing emission reductions and reducing reduction costs. The greatest potential and economic gain, according to the results, come from using more scrap steel and using fewer fossil fuels. At 823 million CNY, the cost–benefit balanced solution reduces CO 2 by 3.0358 Mt. This approach achieved virtually maximum emissions reductions at only 10.9% of the cost of the maximum reduction scenario. This study makes two key contributions. First, it provides a systematic life-cycle cost accounting framework for major CO 2 reduction measures in the steel industry. Second, it develops a Kernel PCA-NSGA-II multi-objective optimization model that explicitly resolves the trade-off between abatement cost and emission reduction volume, offering decision support for steel enterprises under different policy and economic scenarios.

Suggested Citation

  • Shishuang Shang & Yongmei Qi & Jifang Zheng & Ziye Liu & Danping Wang, 2026. "Research on Carbon Emission Reduction Cost Calculation and Path Optimization Based on Life-Cycle Assessment: A Case Study of China’s Steel Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-29, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:10:p:4878-:d:1941783
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/10/4878/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/10/4878/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:10:p:4878-:d:1941783. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.