IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i10p4876-d1941778.html

Linking Voluntary Food Safety Certifications to Environmental, Economic, and Social Performance: A Triple Bottom Line Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Naveed Hayat

    (Department of Economics, Division of Management and Administrative Science, University of Education, Lahore 54770, Pakistan)

  • Ghulam Mustafa

    (Department of Economics, Division of Management and Administrative Science, University of Education, Lahore 54770, Pakistan)

  • Roshan K. Nayak

    (Department of Agricultural, Leadership, and Community Education, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA)

  • Bader Alhafi Alotaib

    (Department of Agricultural Extension and Rural Society, College of Food and Agriculture Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

In the context of growing global concerns about food safety, sustainability, and corporate responsibility, voluntary food safety certifications (VFSC) such as ISO 22000, FSSC 22000, HACCP, and Halal play a critical role in shaping the performance of food processing companies. This study analyzes the impact of VFSC on the triple bottom line (TBL) performance, encompassing environmental, economic, and social aspects, of food processing companies in Pakistan. To accomplish this objective, the study utilizes panel data from 19 listed companies involved in food processing while fixed-effect regressions are employed for empirical estimations. The results indicate that the resource efficiency of ISO 22000-certified food processing companies is, on average, 0.17 points greater than that of non-certified companies. Likewise, the sales of the companies that implement ISO 22000 are, on average, 0.13 percentage points higher than those of companies with no ISO 22000. This suggests that implementing ISO 22000 has a significant impact on enhancing the environmental and economic performance of food processing companies. Furthermore, the sales of companies implementing FSSC 22000 are, on average, 0.17 percentage points higher, whereas the sales of companies implementing HACCP are, on average, 0.23 percentage points higher than those of non-certified companies. Finally, the social performance of companies implementing FSSC 22000 is, on average, 0.06 points higher, whereas the social performance of companies implementing HACCP is, on average, 0.05 points higher than that of non-certified companies. This implies that the implementation of FSSC 22000 and HACCP contributes positively to economic and social performance. These findings offer profound insights for managers, decision-makers, and relevant actors in the food sector, highlighting the importance of strategically implementing VFSC to achieve long-term sustainability and competitiveness.

Suggested Citation

  • Naveed Hayat & Ghulam Mustafa & Roshan K. Nayak & Bader Alhafi Alotaib, 2026. "Linking Voluntary Food Safety Certifications to Environmental, Economic, and Social Performance: A Triple Bottom Line Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-22, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:10:p:4876-:d:1941778
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/10/4876/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/10/4876/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:10:p:4876-:d:1941778. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.