IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i10p4833-d1941107.html

Water Footprint Considerations in Biogas-Based Bioenergy Generation: A Systematic Review of South African Evidence

Author

Listed:
  • Mariam I. Adeoba

    (UNISA Biomechanics Research Group, Department of Mechanical, Bioresources and Biomedical Engineering, College of Science Engineering and Technology (CSET), University of South Africa (UNISA), Florida 1710, South Africa)

  • Harry Ngwangwa

    (UNISA Biomechanics Research Group, Department of Mechanical, Bioresources and Biomedical Engineering, College of Science Engineering and Technology (CSET), University of South Africa (UNISA), Florida 1710, South Africa)

  • Tracy Masebe

    (UNISA Biomechanics Research Group, Department of Mechanical, Bioresources and Biomedical Engineering, College of Science Engineering and Technology (CSET), University of South Africa (UNISA), Florida 1710, South Africa
    Department of Life and Consumer Sciences, College of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, University of South Africa (UNISA), Florida 1710, South Africa)

  • Thanyani Pandelani

    (UNISA Biomechanics Research Group, Department of Mechanical, Bioresources and Biomedical Engineering, College of Science Engineering and Technology (CSET), University of South Africa (UNISA), Florida 1710, South Africa)

Abstract

Biogas production through anaerobic digestion is increasingly recognised as a strategic renewable energy pathway capable of addressing South Africa’s energy insecurity, organic waste management challenges, and climate mitigation goals. However, the water-intensive nature of anaerobic digestion raises critical sustainability concerns in water-scarce regions. This systematic review critically examines the water footprint of biogas-based bioenergy systems, with a specific focus on South Africa’s water-stressed context, to understand how water availability, feedstock selection, digester configuration, and governance frameworks influence system viability and scalability. This study adopts a systematic literature review (SLR) approach guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) methodology; peer-reviewed literature published between 2010 and 2025 was retrieved from Scopus and Web of Science and synthesised through descriptive analysis and qualitative meta-synthesis. The review integrates blue, green, and greywater footprint concepts to assess water use across diverse biogas pathways, including livestock manure, agricultural residues, food waste, wastewater sludge, and aquatic biomass. Findings indicate that wet digestion systems, dominant in South Africa, are highly sensitive to freshwater availability, particularly where slurry dilution relies on blue water. In contrast, wastewater-integrated, semi-wet, and co-digestion systems substantially reduce freshwater demand while enhancing methane yields and process stability. The reuse of greywater, industrial effluents, and digestate emerges as a key strategy for lowering water footprints and strengthening circular water–energy linkages. Despite strong technical potential, the adoption of water-efficient anaerobic digestion systems remains constrained by fragmented governance, infrastructure deficits, and limited empirical data on dry and low-water digestion technologies. The review concludes that embedding water footprint considerations into bioenergy planning, policy, and system design is essential for the sustainable expansion of biogas in South Africa. Integrated water–energy–waste governance, coupled with targeted technological innovation, is critical to ensuring that biogas development enhances both energy security and water sustainability in water-scarce regions.

Suggested Citation

  • Mariam I. Adeoba & Harry Ngwangwa & Tracy Masebe & Thanyani Pandelani, 2026. "Water Footprint Considerations in Biogas-Based Bioenergy Generation: A Systematic Review of South African Evidence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-60, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:10:p:4833-:d:1941107
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/10/4833/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/10/4833/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:10:p:4833-:d:1941107. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.