Author
Listed:
- Yuan Chen
(School of Civil Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China)
- Mohamed Elbleihy
(School of Civil Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China)
- Dorota Wolak
(Faculty of Economics and Sociology, Department of Logistics and Innovation, University of Lodz, 90-214 Lodz, Poland)
- Amir Khan
(College of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518061, China)
- Ling Zhang
(School of Management, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China)
Abstract
Rapid population growth is increasing housing demand and accelerating the expansion of the built environment in Egypt. However, practical and sustainable residential building decarbonization remains constrained by limited supplies of supplementary cementitious materials, limited structural timber resources, code restrictions on cement reduction, and cost sensitivity. This study evaluates two Egyptian multi-unit residential case studies—one affordable housing project and one middle-class housing project—to assess whether wall-system substitution can reduce both embodied and operational carbon under local material, code, and cost constraints. An integrated BIM-based digital twin workflow was used to link quantity takeoff, finite-element structural assessment, and whole-building energy simulation. An architectural BIM model was used for material quantification, wall-system definition, and energy-model inputs. A structural model was used to assess the effects of reducing wall density on reinforcement and concrete demand under gravity and seismic load combinations. Operational performance was assessed through cooling-focused energy simulations under hot-arid climatic conditions representative of Egypt’s new desert cities. Alternative wall systems were then evaluated through scenario- based material substitution and revised structural and energy assessments. The results show that reinforcement, concrete, and wall- core materials account for about 80% of total embodied carbon, while cooling accounts for about 72% of operational emissions. Non-structural cement uses, mainly mortars and finishes, account for 36% of total cement demand, ranging from 161 to 229 tons per building across the two case studies. Replacing conventional partition walls with lightweight, energy-efficient alternatives reduced embodied carbon by up to 35.2%, operational carbon by about 15.7% to 16.5%, and total life-cycle carbon by about 17.4% to 17.5% over a 60- year service life. The average savings per building corresponded to avoiding about 30 tons of steel, 165 m 3 of ready-mix concrete, and 191 m 3 of mortar, with net cost savings of about 3.15 million EGP per building. These results identify a practical pathway toward more sustainable, lower-carbon Egyptian residential buildings without increasing project cost.
Suggested Citation
Yuan Chen & Mohamed Elbleihy & Dorota Wolak & Amir Khan & Ling Zhang, 2026.
"Integrated Embodied-Operational Carbon Reduction for Sustainable Egyptian Housing Through Wall-System Substitution,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-35, May.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:10:p:4825-:d:1941029
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:10:p:4825-:d:1941029. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.