IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i10p4820-d1940906.html

Assessment of Furrow Length and Land Slope on Maize Yield, Irrigation Water Productivity, and Economic Feasibility Under Furrow Irrigation Method in Clay Soils

Author

Listed:
  • Salah S. Abd El-Ghani

    (Department of Economics, College of Business, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), Riyadh 11432, Saudi Arabia)

  • Dalia M. N. El Batran

    (Agricultural Economic Department, Agricultural and Biological Research Institute, National Research Centre, Giza 12622, Egypt)

  • Marwa M. Abdelbaset

    (Water Relations and Field Irrigation Department, National Research Centre, Giza 12622, Egypt)

  • Ahmed F. El-Shafie

    (Water Relations and Field Irrigation Department, National Research Centre, Giza 12622, Egypt)

Abstract

With increasing water scarcity and growing food demand, enhancing agricultural productivity has become a pressing necessity, aligning with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Maize is a strategic crop, yet under surface irrigation, modern technologies are required to optimize irrigation efficiency and reduce water losses. Two field trials were conducted during the summer seasons of 2024 and 2025 on a private farm in Banha, Qalyubia Governorate, Egypt, using a three-replication split-block design. This study evaluated three land slopes (0, 0.05, and 0.15%) and two furrow lengths (50 and 75 m) under furrow irrigation in clay loam soil, using the maize hybrid “Single Cross 2036.” The results demonstrated that both furrow length and land slope significantly affected all measured parameters. Shorter furrows (50 m) consistently outperformed longer ones (75 m), achieving better growth parameters, higher grain yield, improved harvest index, and enhanced irrigation water productivity. Regarding land slope, the 0.15% slope produced the best results, although it was not significantly different from the 0.05% slope in most cases. The interaction between furrow length and land slope was significant; the combination of 50 m furrows with 0.15% slope produced the highest values across all parameters. For longer furrows (75 m), the gentler 0.05% slope was more effective than the steeper 0.15% slope. Notably, 50 m furrows, even with 0% slope, performed better than 75 m furrows with the optimal 0.05% slope, indicating that furrow length is more critical than slope for maximizing maize productivity in clay loam soils. Economic analysis confirmed these findings, with the combination of 50 m furrows and 0.15% slope achieving the highest net return (29,565 EGP ha −1 ) and revenue-to-cost ratio (1.38), representing a substantial increase in net profit compared to traditional practices. Therefore, a 0.15% slope is recommended for shorter furrows (50 m), while a gentler 0.05% slope is more suitable for longer furrows (75 m). These findings provide a practical pathway for policymakers and farmers to enhance resource efficiency and contribute to SDG 2 (Zero Hunger) and SDG 6 (Clean Water and Sanitation).

Suggested Citation

  • Salah S. Abd El-Ghani & Dalia M. N. El Batran & Marwa M. Abdelbaset & Ahmed F. El-Shafie, 2026. "Assessment of Furrow Length and Land Slope on Maize Yield, Irrigation Water Productivity, and Economic Feasibility Under Furrow Irrigation Method in Clay Soils," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-24, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:10:p:4820-:d:1940906
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/10/4820/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/10/4820/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:10:p:4820-:d:1940906. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.