IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i10p4801-d1940409.html

Geopolitical Risk and Energy Security in Egypt: Evidence from 2000–2023

Author

Listed:
  • Hazem H. M. Hassanen

    (Department of Economics, Faculty of Administration, Stardom University, 34510 Istanbul, Turkey)

  • H. M. Hamouda

    (Department of Management Information Systems, College of Business and Economics, Qassim University, Buraidah 52571, Qassim, Saudi Arabia)

  • A. S. Hamid

    (Department of Physics, College of Science, Qassim University, Buraidah 52571, Qassim, Saudi Arabia)

  • Mahmoud R. El-Hawary

    (Department of Management, Thebes Higher Institute for Computer and Administrative Sciences, Cairo 11311, Egypt)

  • Heba Tullah S. M. Abdelaal

    (Department of Basic Sciences, Higher Institute of Marketing, Commerce & Information Systems, Cairo 11865, Egypt)

Abstract

This study examines the dynamic impact of geopolitical risk (GPR) and renewable energy consumption (RENE) on energy security in Egypt from 2000 to 2023. Given the increasing regional instability and Egypt’s strategic pivot toward a green economy, this research employs the Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) bounds testing approach, which is robust for small sample sizes and mixed integration levels. The empirical results provide preliminary evidence of a long-run negative relationship between geopolitical risk and energy security (coefficient: −11.92), suggesting that external political shocks may act as a deterrent to energy stability. Conversely, renewable energy is found to exert an indicative positive influence (coefficient: +1.17) on the energy security index. Notably, these long-run coefficients are significant at the 10% level, implying that while these variables represent emerging structural trends, they remain sensitive to high regional volatility and the evolving nature of the Egyptian energy sector. Diagnostic tests, including Jarque–Bera (0.92) and Breusch–Pagan–Godfrey (0.94) tests, support the model’s reliability, while CUSUM and CUSUMSQ tests indicate general parameter stability. The study suggests that while renewable energy integration shows potential for enhancing resilience, its current scale may not yet be sufficient to fully counterbalance the potential pressures of geopolitical shocks. Policy implications point toward the strategic value of “geopolitical hedging” through continued green investment, the expansion of strategic reserves, and the adoption of de-risking financial instruments like Green Sukuk to support long-term energy sovereignty as a precautionary measure.

Suggested Citation

  • Hazem H. M. Hassanen & H. M. Hamouda & A. S. Hamid & Mahmoud R. El-Hawary & Heba Tullah S. M. Abdelaal, 2026. "Geopolitical Risk and Energy Security in Egypt: Evidence from 2000–2023," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-18, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:10:p:4801-:d:1940409
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/10/4801/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/10/4801/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:10:p:4801-:d:1940409. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.