Author
Listed:
- Leonor Menano de Carvalho
(IDMEC, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, 1049-001 Lisbon, Portugal)
- Paulo Peças
(Efficiencyrising, Lda, 1800-082 Lisbon, Portugal)
- Diogo Jorge
(Efficiencyrising, Lda, 1800-082 Lisbon, Portugal)
Abstract
Lean Six Sigma (LSS) improvement work increasingly depends on information-intensive activities such as document handling, data interpretation, reporting, and communication, yet current discussions of Artificial Intelligence in LSS remain largely technology-centric. This paper proposes a task-first, process-centric framework to support the governed application of Large Language Model (LLM)-enabled tools in such environments. The study makes three contributions: (i) a set of cross-functional organizational process types relevant to LSS practice, (ii) a functional classification of recurring tasks and LLM-enabled tool categories, and (iii) a dual-encoded task–tool matching matrix that separates alignment strength from interaction mode, distinguishing capability fit from governance logic. The framework is empirically anchored through two real-world industrial applications: customs document processing and shop-floor data digitalization and reporting. The results show that (i) stronger outcomes emerge when LLM-enabled support is matched to bounded, repetitive, and structured work, or when analytical support is built on stable and traceable data layers; (ii) operational value depends not only on technical capability, but on workflow embeddedness, data readiness, and human validation checkpoints. The framework also clarifies where support, augmentation, and partial automation are appropriate for different task classes and under explicit accountability constraints in information-intensive administrative work connected to improvement practice and governance.
Suggested Citation
Leonor Menano de Carvalho & Paulo Peças & Diogo Jorge, 2026.
"AI-Enabled Process Improvement in Information-Intensive Administrative Work: Real-Case Applications of LLMs in a Lean Six Sigma Context,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-36, May.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:10:p:4787-:d:1940104
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:10:p:4787-:d:1940104. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.