Author
Listed:
- Yimi Katherine Angel-Sanchez
(Maestría en sistemas sostenibles de producción, Universidad de la Amazonia, Florencia 180001, Colombia
Doctorado en ciencias ambientales, Universidad del Valle, Cali 760042, Colombia
Centro de Investigaciones Amazónicas CIMAZ Macagual Cesar Augusto Estrada González, Universidad de la Amazonía, Florencia 180001, Colombia)
- Ervin Humprey Durán-Bautista
(Ingeniería Agroecológica, Universidad de la Amazonia, Florencia 180001, Colombia
Laboratorio de ecología del suelo, Universidad de la Amazonía, Florencia 180001, Colombia)
- Adriana Eugenia Suárez
(Maestría en sistemas sostenibles de producción, Universidad de la Amazonia, Florencia 180001, Colombia
Centro de Investigaciones Amazónicas CIMAZ Macagual Cesar Augusto Estrada González, Universidad de la Amazonía, Florencia 180001, Colombia
Doctorado en ciencias naturales y desarrollo sustentable, Universidad de la Amazonia, Florencia 180001, Colombia)
- Juan Carlos Suárez
(Centro de Investigaciones Amazónicas CIMAZ Macagual Cesar Augusto Estrada González, Universidad de la Amazonía, Florencia 180001, Colombia
Ingeniería Agroecológica, Universidad de la Amazonia, Florencia 180001, Colombia)
Abstract
Local community knowledge is essential for understanding climate change impacts, as it provides valuable indicators to anticipate climatic behavior and assess risks through adaptation strategies. Surveys and participatory workshops were conducted with 52 producers to identify local climate change indicators and analyze implemented adaptation measures. A systematic indicator framework identified five main indicators: rising temperatures (30% of mentions), strong winds (25%), and three indicators with 15% each: increased rainfall, sudden changes in temperature, and seasonal variations. These indicators were validated against instrumental climate records, confirming the capacity of local knowledge systems to detect gradual and extreme climatic shifts. Rising temperatures stand out as the indicator with the greatest impact. Regarding adaptations, watershed reforestation emerges as the most implemented measure (22.2% of mentions), especially in response to increased temperature and rainfall. The social component shows the highest number of adaptive strategies, with incremental measures predominating. In contrast, soil and agriculture components show the lowest number of implemented measures. Strong winds are considered difficult to control, resulting in less adoption of adaptive strategies. The agricultural component records the lowest percentage of transformational adaptations. Structural barriers, including limited access to technical support, credit systems, and informal land tenure arrangements, constrain the transition toward transformational adaptation, leaving communities reliant on incremental responses that address immediate risks but fall short of reducing long-term vulnerability. These findings underscore the need to integrate traditional knowledge with scientific approaches within institutional frameworks that explicitly address governance gaps to develop sustainable and contextually relevant adaptation strategies.
Suggested Citation
Yimi Katherine Angel-Sanchez & Ervin Humprey Durán-Bautista & Adriana Eugenia Suárez & Juan Carlos Suárez, 2026.
"Local Perceptions and Adaptation Strategies to Climate Change in Rural Communities of the Andean–Amazonian Region: Indicators, Challenges and Opportunities,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-20, May.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:10:p:4763-:d:1939793
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:10:p:4763-:d:1939793. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.