IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i10p4756-d1939532.html

Decoding the “China Paradox” of Urban Polarization: The Push–Pull Dynamics of Land Allocation Bias and Sustainable Urban Governance

Author

Listed:
  • Xintian Yu

    (School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Jilin Jianzhu University, Changchun 130118, China
    Association of Architectural History and Architectural Heritage Protection in Jilin Province, Changchun 130118, China)

  • Xin Wang

    (School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Jilin Jianzhu University, Changchun 130118, China)

  • Hengjie Duan

    (School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Jilin Jianzhu University, Changchun 130118, China)

  • Shufeng Zhang

    (School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Jilin Jianzhu University, Changchun 130118, China)

  • Xin Shen

    (School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Jilin Jianzhu University, Changchun 130118, China)

  • Mingliang Li

    (School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Jilin Jianzhu University, Changchun 130118, China
    The Jilin Province Ecological Wisdom Urban Innovation and Development Strategy Research Center, Changchun 130118, China
    Sub-Laboratory of Ministry of Education MOE Key Laboratory of Building Comprehensive Energy Conservation in Cold Region, Architectural and Urban-Rural Design Energy Conservation Research Center, Changchun 130118, China)

Abstract

Achieving sustainable urban development and optimizing the urban scale structure are central priorities in global governance. However, the relentless population agglomeration in Chinese megacities, despite astronomical living costs, presents a prominent “China Paradox” that seemingly defies classical spatial equilibrium theories. This study decodes this paradox by endogenizing the strategic land supply behaviors of local governments. Utilizing a comprehensive panel dataset of 287 Chinese prefecture-level cities from 2006 to 2020, we construct a multi-dimensional mediation framework and a panel threshold model to investigate how the structural misallocation of land—specifically, the pro-industrial and anti-residential bias—reshapes urban migration dynamics. Empirical results reveal that this land allocation bias acts as the fundamental institutional engine driving urban polarization. Analysis of the transmission pathways reveals a complex push–pull dynamic at the core of this paradox. The artificial restriction of residential land drives up housing prices, generating a profound centrifugal “push” force. However, this dispersion effect is entirely neutralized by two formidable centripetal “pull” forces: industrial co-agglomeration fueled by subsidized manufacturing land, and premium public service capitalization financed through lucrative land revenues. Furthermore, this demographic pull effect exhibits a pronounced inverted U-shaped dynamic, peaking during the rapid growth phase but diminishing precipitously once cities cross the threshold into highly developed megacities ( LnGDP > 11.525). These findings highlight the ultimate unsustainability of the land-driven urbanization model. We propose a paradigm shift towards sustainable urban governance, advocating for stage-specific land supply reforms and the transition from monopolistic land finance to a sustainable property tax system to foster a spatially just and resilient urban hierarchy.

Suggested Citation

  • Xintian Yu & Xin Wang & Hengjie Duan & Shufeng Zhang & Xin Shen & Mingliang Li, 2026. "Decoding the “China Paradox” of Urban Polarization: The Push–Pull Dynamics of Land Allocation Bias and Sustainable Urban Governance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-20, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:10:p:4756-:d:1939532
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/10/4756/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/10/4756/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:10:p:4756-:d:1939532. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.