Author
Listed:
- Changrong Li
(The Center for Modern Chinese City Studies, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China
School of Geographic Sciences, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China)
- Yizheng Zhao
(School of Public Policy & Management, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China)
- Xiang Kong
(The Center for Modern Chinese City Studies, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China
School of Geographic Sciences, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China)
Abstract
Rural tourism is regarded as a significant pathway to enhance the well-being of rural households. However, existing research has yet to systematically examine the moderating role of governance conditions. Using data from the China Rural Revitalization Survey 2022 (CRRS), this study empirically investigates the influence and underlying mechanisms of rural tourism on the subjective well-being of rural residents, employing OLS as the baseline analysis, applying IV to address endogeneity, and using PSM for robustness checks. The findings reveal the following: First, rural tourism enhances the subjective well-being of rural residents. Second, organizational conditions and leadership conditions play a positive moderating role in the impact of rural tourism on rural residents’ well-being. Third, the positive impact of rural tourism on the subjective well-being of rural residents varies significantly across villages, and the realization of this effect is highly contingent on a village’s institutional planning capabilities and the administrative experience of village cadres. The marginal contribution of this study lies in revealing the boundary conditions for rural tourism to enhance rural residents’ well-being and uncovering the moderating mechanism of the governance conditions in the relationship between rural tourism and well-being.
Suggested Citation
Changrong Li & Yizheng Zhao & Xiang Kong, 2026.
"How Does Rural Tourism Enhance Rural Residents’ Well-Being? Moderating Effects of Organizational Conditions and Leadership,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-24, May.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:10:p:4736-:d:1939016
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:10:p:4736-:d:1939016. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.