IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i10p4735-d1939031.html

Selecting Food Loss and Waste Mitigation Technologies Under Preference Uncertainty: An Explainable Multi-Criteria Decision Support Framework

Author

Listed:
  • António Carvalho

    (Centre for the Research and Technology of Agroenvironmental and Biological Sciences (CITAB), Inov4Agro, Universidade de Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro (UTAD), Quinta de Prados, 5000-801 Vila Real, Portugal)

  • João Paulo Moura

    (Centre for the Research and Technology of Agroenvironmental and Biological Sciences (CITAB), Inov4Agro, Universidade de Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro (UTAD), Quinta de Prados, 5000-801 Vila Real, Portugal
    Department of Engineering, School of Sciences and Technology (ECT), University of Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro (UTAD), Quinta de Prados, 5000-801 Vila Real, Portugal)

  • Frederico Branco

    (Department of Engineering, School of Sciences and Technology (ECT), University of Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro (UTAD), Quinta de Prados, 5000-801 Vila Real, Portugal
    INESC TEC—Institute for Systems and Computer Engineering, Technology and Science, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal)

  • Carlos Serôdio

    (Department of Engineering, School of Sciences and Technology (ECT), University of Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro (UTAD), Quinta de Prados, 5000-801 Vila Real, Portugal
    Algoritmi Center, University of Minho, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal)

  • Pedro Couto

    (Centre for the Research and Technology of Agroenvironmental and Biological Sciences (CITAB), Inov4Agro, Universidade de Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro (UTAD), Quinta de Prados, 5000-801 Vila Real, Portugal
    Department of Engineering, School of Sciences and Technology (ECT), University of Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro (UTAD), Quinta de Prados, 5000-801 Vila Real, Portugal)

Abstract

Food Loss and Waste (FLW) remain major challenges for global food security, environmental sustainability, and economic stability, with nearly one-third of food produced each year being lost or wasted. Although many technologies exist to mitigate FLW, they are often assessed separately, making it difficult for decision-makers to compare options and select solutions suited to specific contexts. This research introduces an explainable decision support system (XDSS) that helps prioritise FLW mitigation strategies while accounting for uncertainty in stakeholder preferences. The proposed framework combines the Best–Worst Method (BWM) with Stochastic Multi-criteria Acceptability Analysis for Group Decision-Making (SMAA-2) to produce transparent and uncertainty-aware rankings. It evaluates one hundred FLW mitigation strategies across five contextual criteria: geographic fit, product category, food supply-chain stage, stakeholder role, and technology type. Rather than producing a single fixed ranking, the system generates probabilistic rank-acceptability profiles that indicate the likelihood of each strategy performing well under different preference conditions. Illustrative scenarios demonstrate that the framework can translate qualitative user preferences into robust prioritisation outcomes, with leading alternatives achieving first-rank-acceptability levels between 62% and 74%. These results indicate that the system can support clearer and more flexible decision-making when preferences are incomplete, inconsistent, or uncertain. Although the current results are based on simulated structured cases, the proposed XDSS provides a transparent methodological foundation for future real-world validation and operational deployment. The framework offers practical value for selecting FLW technologies and for policy planning, contributing to more sustainable food systems and supporting progress toward SDG 12.3.

Suggested Citation

  • António Carvalho & João Paulo Moura & Frederico Branco & Carlos Serôdio & Pedro Couto, 2026. "Selecting Food Loss and Waste Mitigation Technologies Under Preference Uncertainty: An Explainable Multi-Criteria Decision Support Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-23, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:10:p:4735-:d:1939031
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/10/4735/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/10/4735/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:10:p:4735-:d:1939031. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.