IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i10p4704-d1938310.html

Carbon Footprint Assessment for Pumps Within the Lifecycle

Author

Listed:
  • Cuimin Feng

    (Key Laboratory of Urban Stormwater System and Water Environment, Ministry of Education, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing 100044, China)

  • Xueqing Jing

    (Key Laboratory of Urban Stormwater System and Water Environment, Ministry of Education, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing 100044, China)

  • Sairui Guan

    (Faculty of Architecture, Civil and Transportation Engineering, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China)

  • Yihao Li

    (Key Laboratory of Urban Stormwater System and Water Environment, Ministry of Education, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing 100044, China)

  • Ziyu Guo

    (Beijing General Municipal Engineering Design & Research Institute Co., Ltd., Beijing 100080, China)

  • Yanlei Zhang

    (Xiong’an Urban Planning and Design Research Institute Co., Ltd., Baoding 071700, China)

  • Mengchan Du

    (Beijing General Municipal Engineering Design & Research Institute Co., Ltd., Beijing 100080, China)

Abstract

Pumps, as critical equipment in water supply and drainage systems, contribute significantly to energy use and carbon emissions throughout their life cycle. This study quantified the life-cycle carbon footprint (LCF) of water supply and drainage pumps by developing a life-cycle assessment (LCA)-based model covering raw material acquisition, production and processing, transportation, operation, and recycling. Using the 400S-40 single-stage double-suction centrifugal pump as a case, the results showed that: (1) the total LCF of the pump was 5567.56 t CO 2 e per unit; and (2) the operational stage accounted for 99.69% of the total life-cycle emissions. The findings indicate that, for the studied case, use-phase electricity consumption dominates the overall carbon footprint under the stated assumptions. Accordingly, for water utilities and pump users, improving operating efficiency and reducing avoidable electricity consumption are critical to carbon reduction. For pump manufacturers, enhancing processing technology, adopting low-carbon materials, improving durability, and promoting component-level maintenance and replacement can reduce embodied carbon and avoid unnecessary emissions associated with premature full-unit replacement. Beyond carbon reduction, these measures are also conducive to resource conservation, sustainable manufacturing, and the low-carbon transition of urban water infrastructure. Therefore, this study provides methodological support for the green design, operation, and management of pump equipment, and contributes to the sustainable development of water supply and drainage systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Cuimin Feng & Xueqing Jing & Sairui Guan & Yihao Li & Ziyu Guo & Yanlei Zhang & Mengchan Du, 2026. "Carbon Footprint Assessment for Pumps Within the Lifecycle," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-15, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:10:p:4704-:d:1938310
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/10/4704/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/10/4704/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:10:p:4704-:d:1938310. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.