Author
Listed:
- Kristina Hiir
(Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Estonian University of Life Sciences, F. R. Kreutzwaldi 1a, 51006 Tartu, Estonia)
- Taavi Kiisk
(Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Estonian University of Life Sciences, F. R. Kreutzwaldi 1a, 51006 Tartu, Estonia)
- Jüri Lillemets
(Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Estonian University of Life Sciences, F. R. Kreutzwaldi 1a, 51006 Tartu, Estonia)
- Liis Oper
(Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Estonian University of Life Sciences, F. R. Kreutzwaldi 1a, 51006 Tartu, Estonia)
- Rando Värnik
(Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Estonian University of Life Sciences, F. R. Kreutzwaldi 1a, 51006 Tartu, Estonia)
Abstract
Across production and processing systems, biological residuals are inconsistently defined, with the same materials treated as waste, by-products, or resources depending on context. This ambiguity constrains the identification of valorization pathways and limits the design of sustainable and resource-efficient operational strategies. This study addresses the issue by compiling a sector-resolved inventory of 94 bioresiduals across 12 bioeconomy-related activities. Analyzing 1763 firm–bioresidual observations from a national survey in Estonia using binomial logistic regression. The results show that bioresidual use is primarily shaped by operational and data-handling practices, particularly collection and accounting, rather than by structural firm characteristics. Separate collection emerges as a key precondition for higher-value use, while accounting practices are associated with external and energy-related pathways by increasing visibility and traceability. In contrast, irregular or seasonal bioresiduals tend to default to waste handling due to variability and perishability. The findings also indicate that many effective uses remain internal to production systems and are under-documented. Improving the definitions and monitoring practices of bioresiduals could support more efficient and sustainable resource management by reducing biowaste generation and enhancing coordination across value chains, thereby fostering the development of a circular bioeconomy.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:10:p:4678-:d:1937786. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.