IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i10p4673-d1937710.html

Adoption of Artificial Intelligence and Sustainable Learning Outcomes in Engineering Education: Evidence from the Technology Acceptance Model

Author

Listed:
  • Brunella Talledo Monroy

    (School of Industrial Engineering, Catholic University of Santa Maria, Arequipa 04013, Peru)

  • Fernando Aron De La Cruz Mendoza

    (School of Civil Engineering, Catholic University of Santa Maria, Arequipa 04013, Peru)

  • Dely Lazo Barreda

    (School of System Engineering, Catholic University of Santa Maria, Arequipa 04013, Peru)

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is transforming higher education by introducing new learning dynamics based on automation, personalization, and data analytics. Within the framework of sustainable development, its integration into university education represents an opportunity to enhance the quality, accessibility, and resilience of educational systems, in alignment with Sustainable Development Goal 4 (SDG 4). Nevertheless, there remains limited empirical evidence regarding how the adoption of these technologies influences learning outcomes, particularly in engineering education contexts within developing countries. This study analyzes the adoption of artificial intelligence tools among engineering students and evaluates their impact on academic performance from the perspective of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). A structural model is proposed that examines the relationships among perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, attitude toward AI, intention to use, and perceived academic learning. Based on a sample of 389 university students, the data were analyzed using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). The results confirm that perceived ease of use significantly influences perceived usefulness, and that both variables positively impact attitudes toward artificial intelligence. In turn, attitude significantly influences usage intention, which is positively correlated with academic performance. Notably, attitude emerges as the primary predictor of learning, underscoring the central role of attitudinal factors in technology adoption. Furthermore, a slight negative effect of perceived ease of use on learning is identified, suggesting potential risks of superficial engagement or cognitive dependency in highly automated environments. These findings contribute to the literature by extending the TAM model to the analysis of sustainable learning, demonstrating that the adoption of artificial intelligence depends not solely on functional factors, but on interrelated cognitive, attitudinal, and behavioral processes. From a practical perspective, the study offers implications for higher education institutions, highlighting the need to promote a critical, reflective, and pedagogically guided use of artificial intelligence. This research provides empirical evidence from the context of engineering education in a developing country, contributing to an understanding of the role of artificial intelligence in building sustainable learning environments.

Suggested Citation

  • Brunella Talledo Monroy & Fernando Aron De La Cruz Mendoza & Dely Lazo Barreda, 2026. "Adoption of Artificial Intelligence and Sustainable Learning Outcomes in Engineering Education: Evidence from the Technology Acceptance Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-17, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:10:p:4673-:d:1937710
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/10/4673/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/10/4673/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:10:p:4673-:d:1937710. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.