IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i10p4658-d1937379.html

An Affordance-Based Model for the Sustainable Design of Community Food Waste Management Facilities

Author

Listed:
  • Cuiyu Li

    (School of Industrial Design, Hubei University of Technology, Wuhan 430068, China)

  • Kunhao Wang

    (School of Industrial Design, Hubei University of Technology, Wuhan 430068, China)

  • Yuting Hu

    (School of Art & Design, Hubei University of Technology, Wuhan 430068, China)

  • Tianyu Wei

    (School of Industrial Design, Hubei University of Technology, Wuhan 430068, China)

Abstract

This study addresses the issue of low utilization rates of kitchen waste recycling facilities in urban communities in China, caused by insufficient resident willingness to participate and sustain use, which impacts the efficiency of urban sustainability. A system design model based on Affordance Theory (BIATM) is proposed to connect behavioral insights with design and decision-making tools to improve sustainability outcomes at the local level. This model includes three components: demand classification identification based on Affordance Theory and the Best-Worst Method (BWM), hierarchical relationship analysis of demand based on Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM), and design transformation based on Affordance Theory. Unlike prior approaches that apply affordance theory as a post hoc interpretive lens, this study operationalizes it as a generative design tool integrated with quantitative demand analysis. The results indicate that “Incentive Feedback” is a key factor directly influencing sustained participation behavior, while factors related to hygiene anxiety and operational burden are fundamental constraints to residents’ use of community kitchen waste recycling facilities. This suggests that the explicit needs expressed by residents may not always be the primary drivers of behavior initiation and continuity. To promote sustained participation, design should prioritize meeting deeper behavioral prerequisites and maintain participation through superficial feedback and incentive mechanisms. Based on this analysis, three design proposals for community kitchen waste management facilities are presented, evaluated, and optimized using the TOPSIS method. The study concludes that combining demand weight identification, hierarchical relationship analysis, and Affordance Theory translation effectively supports the identification, design generation, and optimization of community kitchen waste management facilities, providing a methodological reference for the sustainable design of public service facilities and practical pathways for promoting resident participation in community resource recycling.

Suggested Citation

  • Cuiyu Li & Kunhao Wang & Yuting Hu & Tianyu Wei, 2026. "An Affordance-Based Model for the Sustainable Design of Community Food Waste Management Facilities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-34, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:10:p:4658-:d:1937379
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/10/4658/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/10/4658/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:10:p:4658-:d:1937379. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.