IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i10p4639-d1937020.html

A Systematic Review on Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Solar PV Modules

Author

Listed:
  • Ramchandra Bhandari

    (Institute for Natural Resources Technology and Management (ITT), Faculty of Spatial Development and Infrastructure Systems, TH Köln (University of Applied Sciences), 50679 Cologne, Germany)

  • Erisa Sekimuli

    (Institute for Natural Resources Technology and Management (ITT), Faculty of Spatial Development and Infrastructure Systems, TH Köln (University of Applied Sciences), 50679 Cologne, Germany)

Abstract

This review examines an environmental LCA of solar modules and cell technologies across 18 environmental indicators to assess the performance of current solar module types. It provides a more comprehensive analysis by including studies that account for recycling credits in end-of-life PV waste management. The literature search covered seven databases up to 20 November 2025, resulting in the selection of 43 papers focused on solar modules, LCA, and recycling for data extraction. The methodological quality and risk of bias of included studies were evaluated based on compliance with ISO 14040 and ISO 14044 requirements. Due to the diversity of methodologies, functional units, and system boundaries across studies, it is observed that there is a wide range of emission values for the various solar PV technologies, with some studies reporting very high or very low figures. Considering one of the main impact categories, GHG emissions of key PV technologies, including mono c-Si, multi c-Si, CdTe, and PERC modules, for the study period 2015–2025 have been reported in the ranges of 493–2760, 640–2418, 312–2140, and 425–1759 kg CO 2 -eq/kW p . It can be generally expected that when assessed under comparable LCA frameworks, emerging solar cells are more likely to exhibit lower emissions than conventional silicon-based solar cells across most indicators. Moreover, results from recent studies show an environmental improvement for the various module and cell types, largely due to advancements in material efficiency during the optimized manufacturing process. A major limitation of this study is the omission of service lifetime considerations, as most sustainability assessments are ideally based on lifetime energy generation (kWh). However, given the assumption of comparable lifetimes among the assessed module types, the use of kW p -based emissions remains suitable for relative comparisons, although possible differences in long-term performance may not be fully captured.

Suggested Citation

  • Ramchandra Bhandari & Erisa Sekimuli, 2026. "A Systematic Review on Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Solar PV Modules," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-32, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:10:p:4639-:d:1937020
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/10/4639/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/10/4639/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:10:p:4639-:d:1937020. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.