IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i10p4633-d1936915.html

Threshold-like Structure and Barrier–Benefit Asymmetry in Students’ Behavioural Intention Toward E-Learning: An Explainable Machine Learning Analysis in Post-Pandemic Higher Education

Author

Listed:
  • Grzegorz Słowiński

    (School of Computer Science & Technologies, VIZJA University, Okopowa 59, 01-043 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Yan Kapranov

    (School of Humanities & Fine Arts, VIZJA University, Okopowa 59, 01-043 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Bożena Iwanowska

    (School of Social Sciences, VIZJA University, Okopowa 59, 01-043 Warsaw, Poland)

Abstract

This study examines students’ behavioural intention (BI) to use e-learning in post-pandemic higher education, addressing a critical research gap: the tendency of standard linear models to obscure the complex, hidden structural mechanisms of technology acceptance. Building on the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), the article re-analyses post-COVID-19 survey data from a private university in Warsaw, Poland, to test whether behavioural intention is shaped only by linear effects or also by hidden nonlinear mechanisms. Complementary explainable machine learning models (XAIs) are used to identify the model’s stable linear core, threshold-like structure, and nonlinear predictor effects. The findings confirm the central role of perceived usefulness (PU) and perceived ease of use (PEOU) within the TAM framework. Crucially, the results show that, once the broader attitudinal domain toward remote learning is decomposed into negative (NEG) and positive (POS) evaluative components, negative evaluations exert a substantially stronger suppressive effect on behavioural intention than positive evaluations exert as facilitators. In the standardised linear benchmark, the absolute effect of NEG is nearly twice that of POS, with SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis confirming this asymmetry at the nonlinear level. Furthermore, nonlinear models (partial dependence plots and decision trees) identify a threshold-like transition region in the PU-BI relationship, where acceptance increases rapidly only after exceeding a specific utility level. For educational policy, these results imply a hierarchical intervention strategy: institutional efforts should prioritise crossing the critical utility threshold and focus on systematically reducing specific barriers (NEG) rather than relying solely on promoting the general benefits of digital formats. Overall, the study confirms the TAM as a robust baseline framework while showing that post-pandemic e-learning acceptance is additionally shaped by asymmetric and threshold-like mechanisms that remain partly hidden in standard linear models.

Suggested Citation

  • Grzegorz Słowiński & Yan Kapranov & Bożena Iwanowska, 2026. "Threshold-like Structure and Barrier–Benefit Asymmetry in Students’ Behavioural Intention Toward E-Learning: An Explainable Machine Learning Analysis in Post-Pandemic Higher Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-26, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:10:p:4633-:d:1936915
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/10/4633/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/10/4633/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:10:p:4633-:d:1936915. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.