Author
Listed:
- Zhang Cheng
(School of Economics and Management, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China)
- Zhiyu Chen
(The University of Sydney Business School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia)
- Yi Wei
(Zhongtai Securities Institute for Financial Studies, Shandong University, Jinan 250100, China)
Abstract
Rising climate policy uncertainty increases the complexity of firms’ financing decisions, particularly for Specialized, Refinement, Differential, and Innovation (SRDI) enterprises that rely heavily on external financing. Accordingly, using data on 262 SRDI firms from 2011 to 2023, this paper conducts empirical analysis to systematically examine the relationship between climate policy uncertainty and SRDI firms’ equity financing decisions. We find a significant inverted U-shaped relationship between climate policy uncertainty and the equity financing ratio of SRDI firms. When uncertainty is low to moderate, firms are more inclined to raise the proportion of equity financing to preemptively lock in capital; however, as uncertainty rises further, valuation discounts and financing frictions intensify, thereby suppressing equity financing. These conclusions remain unchanged after a series of robustness checks. Mechanism tests indicate that climate policy uncertainty affects equity financing mainly through two channels: higher debt financing costs and lower firm value. The former encourages substitution from debt-to-equity financing, whereas the latter suppresses equity financing by increasing its implicit costs. Further heterogeneity analyses show that this effect is more pronounced among private firms, firms in more highly concentrated industries, and firms with weaker risk resilience. Our findings inform innovative firms’ financing decisions and sustainable development under climate policy uncertainty.
Suggested Citation
Zhang Cheng & Zhiyu Chen & Yi Wei, 2026.
"Preemptive Move or Wait-and-See? Climate Policy Uncertainty and Equity Financing of SRDI Enterprises in China,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-22, May.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:10:p:4632-:d:1936886
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:10:p:4632-:d:1936886. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.