IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2025i1p90-d1823104.html

Automated Hurricane Damage Classification for Sustainable Disaster Recovery Using 3D LiDAR and Machine Learning: A Post-Hurricane Michael Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Jackson Kisingu Ndolo

    (Moss School of Construction, College of Engineering and Computing, Florida International University, Miami, FL 33199, USA)

  • Ivan Oyege

    (Department of Earth and Environment, Florida International University, Miami, FL 33199, USA
    Department of Chemistry, Busitema University, Tororo P.O. Box 236, Uganda)

  • Leonel Lagos

    (Moss School of Construction, College of Engineering and Computing, Florida International University, Miami, FL 33199, USA)

Abstract

Accurate mapping of hurricane-induced damage is essential for guiding rapid disaster response and long-term recovery planning. This study evaluates the Three-Dimensional Multi-Attributes, Multiscale, Multi-Cloud (3DMASC) framework for semantic classification of pre- and post-hurricane Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) data, using Mexico Beach, Florida, as a case study following Hurricane Michael. The goal was to assess the framework’s ability to classify stable landscape features and detect damage-specific classes in a highly complex post-disaster environment. Bitemporal topo-bathymetric LiDAR datasets from 2017 (pre-event) and 2018 (post-event) were processed to extract more than 80 geometric, radiometric, and echo-based features at multiple spatial scales. A Random Forest classifier was trained on a 2.37 km 2 pre-hurricane area (Zone A) and evaluated on an independent 0.95 km 2 post-hurricane area (Zone B). Pre-hurricane classification achieved an overall accuracy of 0.9711, with stable classes such as ground, water, and buildings achieving precision and recall exceeding 0.95. Post-hurricane classification maintained similar accuracy; however, damage-related classes exhibited lower performance, with debris reaching an F1-score of 0.77, damaged buildings 0.58, and vehicles recording a recall of only 0.13. These results indicate that the workflow is effective for rapid mapping of persistent structures, with additional refinements needed for detailed damage classification. Misclassifications were concentrated along class boundaries and in structurally ambiguous areas, consistent with known LiDAR limitations in disaster contexts. These results demonstrate the robustness and spatial transferability of the 3DMASC–Random Forest approach for disaster mapping. Integrating multispectral data, improving small-object representation, and incorporating automated debris volume estimation could further enhance classification reliability, enabling faster, more informed post-disaster decision-making. By enabling rapid, accurate damage mapping, this approach supports sustainable disaster recovery, resource-efficient debris management, and resilience planning in hurricane-prone regions.

Suggested Citation

  • Jackson Kisingu Ndolo & Ivan Oyege & Leonel Lagos, 2025. "Automated Hurricane Damage Classification for Sustainable Disaster Recovery Using 3D LiDAR and Machine Learning: A Post-Hurricane Michael Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-18, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2025:i:1:p:90-:d:1823104
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/1/90/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/1/90/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2025:i:1:p:90-:d:1823104. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.