IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2025i1p49-d1822310.html

Assessing Urban Flood Resilience with Unascertained Measurement Theory: A Case Study of Jiangxi Province, China

Author

Listed:
  • Shuhong Liu

    (Jiangxi Provincial Key Laboratory of Safe and Efficient Mining of Rare Metal Resources, Jiangxi University of Science and Technology, Ganzhou 341000, China
    School of Safety Engineering, Jiangxi University of Science and Technology, Ganzhou 341000, China)

  • Lu Feng

    (Jiangxi Provincial Key Laboratory of Safe and Efficient Mining of Rare Metal Resources, Jiangxi University of Science and Technology, Ganzhou 341000, China
    School of Safety Engineering, Jiangxi University of Science and Technology, Ganzhou 341000, China)

  • Jing Xie

    (Jiangxi Provincial Key Laboratory of Safe and Efficient Mining of Rare Metal Resources, Jiangxi University of Science and Technology, Ganzhou 341000, China
    School of Safety Engineering, Jiangxi University of Science and Technology, Ganzhou 341000, China)

  • Yuxian Ke

    (Jiangxi Provincial Key Laboratory of Safe and Efficient Mining of Rare Metal Resources, Jiangxi University of Science and Technology, Ganzhou 341000, China
    School of Safety Engineering, Jiangxi University of Science and Technology, Ganzhou 341000, China
    Yichun Lithium New Energy Industry Research Institute, Jiangxi University of Science and Technology, Yichun 336000, China)

Abstract

With the acceleration of global climate change and urbanization, urban flooding disasters have become increasingly frequent, posing significant threats to urban safety and sustainable development. Enhancing Urban Flood Resilience (UFR) has become a central issue in urban risk management and spatial planning. This study aims to scientifically assess UFR by employing the core concepts of resistance, recovery, and adaptation from urban resilience theory. A set of 20 indicators for assessing UFR is selected from four aspects: infrastructure, social economy, technological monitoring, and the ecological environment. Addressing the limitations of traditional evaluation methods, which struggle to effectively handle data gaps and ambiguous boundaries, and fail to balance subjective and objective weights, this study introduces the unascertained measure theory and adopts a combined weighting method to construct a UFR evaluation model. Using 2023 statistical data from Jiangxi Province, a comprehensive evaluation of flood resilience was conducted across 11 prefecture-level cities within the province. The analysis indicates that, among level-2 indicators, infrastructure holds the highest weight at 43.7%. Regarding resilience dimensions, resistance dominates with a weight of 54.6%. Furthermore, significant spatial disparities exist in flood resilience levels across Jiangxi Province: high resilience cities are distributed in central and northern Jiangxi, moderately high resilience cities account for the largest proportion. Only one city, Pingxiang, exhibits moderate resilience.

Suggested Citation

  • Shuhong Liu & Lu Feng & Jing Xie & Yuxian Ke, 2025. "Assessing Urban Flood Resilience with Unascertained Measurement Theory: A Case Study of Jiangxi Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-24, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2025:i:1:p:49-:d:1822310
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/1/49/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/1/49/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2025:i:1:p:49-:d:1822310. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.