IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2025i1p405-d1830702.html

Leaf–Air Temperature Difference as a Nondestructive Indicator of Waterlogging Tolerance in Cassava Genotypes

Author

Listed:
  • Lado Aquilino

    (The United Graduate School of Agricultural Sciences, Kagoshima University, Kagoshima City 890-0065, Japan
    Directorate of Research and Training, Ministry of Agriculture and Food Security, Ministries Complex, Parliament Road, Juba City P.O. Box 33, South Sudan)

  • Ten Naito

    (Faculty of Agriculture, Kagoshima University, Kagoshima City 890-0065, Japan)

  • Alex Tamu

    (The United Graduate School of Agricultural Sciences, Kagoshima University, Kagoshima City 890-0065, Japan
    Sierra Leone Agricultural Research Institute, Freetown PMB 1313, Sierra Leone)

  • Peter Ssenyonga

    (The United Graduate School of Agricultural Sciences, Kagoshima University, Kagoshima City 890-0065, Japan
    Rwebitaba Zonal Agricultural Research and Development Institute, National Agricultural Research Organization, Entebbe, Kampala P.O. Box 295, Uganda)

  • Rael Chepkoech

    (The United Graduate School of Agricultural Sciences, Kagoshima University, Kagoshima City 890-0065, Japan)

  • Ibrahim Soe

    (The United Graduate School of Agricultural Sciences, Kagoshima University, Kagoshima City 890-0065, Japan
    Sierra Leone Agricultural Research Institute, Freetown PMB 1313, Sierra Leone)

  • Jun-Ichi Sakagami

    (The United Graduate School of Agricultural Sciences, Kagoshima University, Kagoshima City 890-0065, Japan
    Faculty of Agriculture, Kagoshima University, Kagoshima City 890-0065, Japan)

Abstract

Cassava plants’ response to waterlogging must be monitored in an accurate and timely manner to mitigate the adverse effects of waterlogging stress. Under waterlogging conditions, root hypoxia reduces water uptake and stomatal closure limits transpiration, which often results in increased leaf temperature due to reduced evaporative cooling. However, how this relationship changes in cassava leaves under waterlogged conditions remains poorly understood. This study hypothesized that more negative ΔT values reflect enhanced transpirational cooling, which is a key determinant of superior physiological performance under waterlogging stress among cassava genotypes. Two cassava cultivars were subjected to twelve days of waterlogging. Results revealed a significant decrease in photosynthetic rate ( p < 0.001), stomatal conductance ( p < 0.001), and transpiration rate ( p < 0.001), as well as an increase in leaf temperature ( p < 0.001) and ΔT ( p < 0.001), reflecting impaired stomatal regulation and reduced evaporative cooling. Strong negative correlations between ΔT and photosynthetic parameters (Pn ( p < 0.001, r = −0.91), gs ( p < 0.001, r = −0.91), and E ( p < 0.001, r = −0.87)) were observed, presenting ΔT as a reliable, nondestructive indicator of cassava’s physiological responses under hypoxic conditions. Findings indicate that maintaining cooler canopies may contribute to waterlogging-tolerant cassava genotypes, and that ΔT can act as a screening parameter for waterlogging-tolerant genotypes. However, further studies with contrasting genotypes and additional parameters are recommended for validation.

Suggested Citation

  • Lado Aquilino & Ten Naito & Alex Tamu & Peter Ssenyonga & Rael Chepkoech & Ibrahim Soe & Jun-Ichi Sakagami, 2025. "Leaf–Air Temperature Difference as a Nondestructive Indicator of Waterlogging Tolerance in Cassava Genotypes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-18, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2025:i:1:p:405-:d:1830702
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/1/405/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/1/405/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2025:i:1:p:405-:d:1830702. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.