IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2025i1p399-d1830286.html

Scrutiny and Spending Shifts: How Participatory Budgeting Reduces Local Government Debt

Author

Listed:
  • Fanghui Zheng

    (School of Public Policy and Administration, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China
    School of Public Administration, South China University of Technology (SCUT), Guangzhou 510641, China)

  • Hongsheng Lin

    (School of Public Policy and Administration, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China
    School of Public Administration, South China University of Technology (SCUT), Guangzhou 510641, China)

  • Bolin Liu

    (Institute of Guangdong, Hong Kong and Macao Development Studies, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China)

  • Rui Fei

    (School of Public Administration, Guangdong University of Finance, Guangzhou 510521, China)

Abstract

Fiscal capacity is a core dimension of state capacity. Effective oversight of public expenditure is therefore essential for fiscal sustainability, a foundational element of sustainable development. As local government debt has steadily increased in China, participatory budgeting has emerged as an innovative mechanism for citizens to exercise such oversight and influence fiscal decisions. Our paper examines the effect of participatory budgeting on local government debt in China. Using a panel dataset covering 242 Chinese cities from 2013 to 2022, we examine the effect of participatory budgeting adoption on the scale of explicit government debt. Our results show that adopting participatory budgeting moderately reduces local government debt levels. Further mechanism analysis indicates that participatory budgeting operates through two channels. First, by enhancing budgetary transparency, it strengthens public scrutiny, which in turn disciplines government borrowing. Second, it redirects public spending toward welfare sectors like education and health, thereby crowding out large, debt-financed investment projects. Our findings contribute to the literature on participatory budgeting, fiscal democracy, and bottom-up accountability in public finance. The results suggest that participatory budgeting can be an effective policy tool for improving fiscal discipline and curbing government debt risks, ultimately fostering more sustainable and equitable local governance.

Suggested Citation

  • Fanghui Zheng & Hongsheng Lin & Bolin Liu & Rui Fei, 2025. "Scrutiny and Spending Shifts: How Participatory Budgeting Reduces Local Government Debt," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-21, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2025:i:1:p:399-:d:1830286
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/1/399/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/1/399/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2025:i:1:p:399-:d:1830286. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.