IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2025i1p392-d1829929.html

Difference in Soil Fertility Agricultural Training, Local Livestock Feed Use and Weather Information Access: A Comparative Study of Small-Scale Farmers in Mozambique and Zambia

Author

Listed:
  • Albert Novas Somanje

    (Ministry of Agriculture, Zambia Agriculture Research Institute (ZARI), Mochipapa Regional Research Station, Choma P.O. Box 630090, Zambia
    Ministry of Agriculture, Department of Agriculture, Lusumpuko House, Choma P.O. Box 630042, Zambia
    NelNov Consultants, Lusaka P.O. Box 34714, Zambia)

  • Maria Malunga

    (Ministry of Agriculture, Zambia Agriculture Research Institute (ZARI), Mochipapa Regional Research Station, Choma P.O. Box 630090, Zambia)

  • Yasa Chisanga

    (Ministry of Agriculture, Zambia Agriculture Research Institute (ZARI), Mochipapa Regional Research Station, Choma P.O. Box 630090, Zambia)

  • Nswana Kafwamfwa

    (Ministry of Agriculture, Zambia Agriculture Research Institute (ZARI), Mochipapa Regional Research Station, Choma P.O. Box 630090, Zambia)

  • Atanasio Vidane

    (Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Eduardo Mondlane University, Maputo 1109, Mozambique)

  • Filomena Dos Anjos

    (Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Eduardo Mondlane University, Maputo 1109, Mozambique)

  • Laurinda Augusto

    (Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Eduardo Mondlane University, Maputo 1109, Mozambique)

  • Cesaltina Tchamo

    (Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Eduardo Mondlane University, Maputo 1109, Mozambique)

  • Amon Taruvinga

    (Department of Agricultural Economics, Extension and Agribusiness, University of Fort Hare, Alicei 5700, South Africa)

  • Kafula Chisanga

    (Ministry of Agriculture, Zambia Agriculture Research Institute (ZARI), Mochipapa Regional Research Station, Choma P.O. Box 630090, Zambia
    NelNov Consultants, Lusaka P.O. Box 34714, Zambia)

Abstract

This study employs a mixed-method approach, including surveys with 498 smallholder farmers as respondents (186 in Mozambique and 312 in Zambia) and focus group discussions, to compare sustainable soil management and livestock feed management practices. This study shows critical gaps in agricultural extension, significant differences were found, with a higher proportion of Zambian farmers receiving training on soil fertility management (42.2% versus 3.2% in Mozambique, p < 0.001) and using locally produced feeds (78.5% versus 1.6%, p < 0.001). Whereas access to weather information was higher in Mozambique (50.5%) than in Zambia (22.8%). The findings show critical gaps in agricultural extension in Mozambique and Zambia in areas under cowpea, oilseed crops, and vegetables (t = 8.375, p < 0.001; t = 4.138, p < 0.001; and t = 3.104, p < 0.002, respectively). We recommend targeted investment in farmer training programs, including feed formulation and context-specific weather information dissemination to enhance climate resilience and food security.

Suggested Citation

  • Albert Novas Somanje & Maria Malunga & Yasa Chisanga & Nswana Kafwamfwa & Atanasio Vidane & Filomena Dos Anjos & Laurinda Augusto & Cesaltina Tchamo & Amon Taruvinga & Kafula Chisanga, 2025. "Difference in Soil Fertility Agricultural Training, Local Livestock Feed Use and Weather Information Access: A Comparative Study of Small-Scale Farmers in Mozambique and Zambia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-15, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2025:i:1:p:392-:d:1829929
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/1/392/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/1/392/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2025:i:1:p:392-:d:1829929. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.