IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2025i1p359-d1829283.html

Identification of Potential Flood-Prone Areas in the Republic of Kosovo Using GIS-Based Multi-Criteria Decision-Making and the Analytical Hierarchy Process

Author

Listed:
  • Bashkim Idrizi

    (Geodesy Department, University of Prishtina, 10000 Prishtina, Kosovo)

  • Agon Nimani

    (Geodesy Department, University of Prishtina, 10000 Prishtina, Kosovo)

  • Lyubka Pashova

    (National Institute of Geophysics, Geodesy and Geography—Bulgarian Academy of Sciences (NIGGG—BAS), 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria)

Abstract

Floods rank among the most frequent and destructive natural hazards, threatening ecosystems, human settlements, and national economies. This study delineates flood-prone areas across Kosovo by developing a national-scale Flood Risk Database (FRDB) and a comprehensive mapping framework integrating Geographic Information Systems (GIS), Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM), and the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). Eight hydrological and topographic conditioning factors—slope, elevation, flow accumulation, distance to rivers, land use/land cover, soil type, precipitation, and drainage density—were analyzed. AHP was employed to assign factor weights based on their relative influence on flood susceptibility, while MCDM aggregated these weighted spatial layers to generate a national flood risk map. Model validation, based on historical flood points, achieved an AUC of 0.909, confirming its high predictive accuracy. The resulting flood risk map classifies Kosovo’s territory into five risk levels: very high (0.56%), high (14.44%), moderate (36.68%), low (46.46%), and very low (1.88%). This research provides the first systematic national-scale FRDB for Kosovo, offering a reliable scientific basis for flood management, spatial planning, and climate resilience policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Bashkim Idrizi & Agon Nimani & Lyubka Pashova, 2025. "Identification of Potential Flood-Prone Areas in the Republic of Kosovo Using GIS-Based Multi-Criteria Decision-Making and the Analytical Hierarchy Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-27, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2025:i:1:p:359-:d:1829283
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/1/359/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/1/359/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2025:i:1:p:359-:d:1829283. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.