IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2025i1p349-d1829075.html

Trading Quality for Quantity? Export Control and Innovation Dilemma: Evidence from Chinese Listed Manufacturing Firms

Author

Listed:
  • Shengkai Zhou

    (School of Business Administration, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu 611130, China)

  • Fanghao Chen

    (School of Management, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China)

  • Meng Tan

    (School of Computing and Artificial Intelligence, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu 611130, China)

Abstract

The recent rise of trade protectionism has complicated the relationship between trade and innovation in some countries. This paper evaluates the impact of U.S. export control on the innovation performance of Chinese manufacturing listed firms. Based on firm-level invention patent data from 2015 to 2023, we find that firms subject to export control substantially expand their patent application activities. However, the quantitative expansion coincides with a deterioration in patent quality, as evidenced by the fast-track granted rate. Further analysis suggests that the divergence between firms’ internal innovation preferences, as reflected in management’s innovation awareness, knowledge width and technological trajectory, and their external R&D investment, underlies the innovation quantity–quality tension. Moreover, the decline in innovation quality is primarily concentrated in technological fields not favored by Chinese industrial policy and among state-owned enterprises, suggesting strategic balancing of innovation decisions in response to government intervention. This study provides further insights into the comprehensive impact of trade shock on innovation and contributes to the literature on the potential technological externalities of the U.S.–China trade conflict.

Suggested Citation

  • Shengkai Zhou & Fanghao Chen & Meng Tan, 2025. "Trading Quality for Quantity? Export Control and Innovation Dilemma: Evidence from Chinese Listed Manufacturing Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-30, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2025:i:1:p:349-:d:1829075
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/1/349/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/1/349/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2025:i:1:p:349-:d:1829075. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.