Author
Listed:
- Arianna Latini
(Department for Sustainability, Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development (ENEA), Via Anguillarese 301, 00123 Rome, Italy)
- Luciana Di Gregorio
(Department for Sustainability, Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development (ENEA), Via Anguillarese 301, 00123 Rome, Italy)
- Elena Valkama
(Bioeconomy and Environment Unit, Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), Itäinen Pitkäkatu 4 A, 20520 Turku, Finland)
- Manuela Costanzo
(Department for Sustainability, Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development (ENEA), Via Anguillarese 301, 00123 Rome, Italy)
- Peter Maenhout
(Plant Sciences Unit, Flanders Research Institute for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (ILVO), Burg. Van Gansberghelaan 109, 9820 Merelbeke, Belgium)
- Marjetka Suhadolc
(Biotechnical Faculty (ULBF), University of Ljubljana, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia)
- Francesco Vitali
(Research Centre for Agriculture and Environment, Council for Agricultural Research and Economics (CREA-AA), Via di Lanciola 12/A, 50125 Cascine del Riccio, Italy)
- Stefano Mocali
(Research Centre for Agriculture and Environment, Council for Agricultural Research and Economics (CREA-AA), Via di Lanciola 12/A, 50125 Cascine del Riccio, Italy)
- Alessandra Lagomarsino
(Research Centre for Agriculture and Environment, Council for Agricultural Research and Economics (CREA-AA), Via di Lanciola 12/A, 50125 Cascine del Riccio, Italy)
- Annamaria Bevivino
(Department for Sustainability, Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development (ENEA), Via Anguillarese 301, 00123 Rome, Italy)
Abstract
The role of soil microbial communities in soil organic matter (OM) decomposition, transformation, and the global nitrogen (N) and carbon (C) cycles has been widely investigated. However, a comprehensive understanding of how specific agricultural practices and OM inputs shape microbial-driven processes across different European pedoclimatic conditions is still lacking, particularly regarding their effectiveness in mitigating greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. This systematic review synthesizes current knowledge on the biotic mechanisms underlying soil C sequestration and GHG reduction, emphasizing key microbial processes influenced by land management practices. A rigorous selection was applied, resulting in 16 eligible articles that addressed the targeted outcomes: soil microorganism biodiversity, including microbiome composition and other common Biodiversity Indexes, C sequestration and non-CO 2 GHG emissions (namely N 2 O and CH 4 emissions), and N leaching. The review highlights that, despite some variations across studies, the application of OM enhances soil microbial biomass (MB) and activity, boosts soil organic carbon (SOC), and potentially reduces emissions. Notably, plant richness and diversity emerged as critical factors in reducing N 2 O emissions and promoting carbon storage. However, the lack of methodological standardization across studies hinders meaningful comparison of outcomes—a key challenge identified in this review. The analysis reveals that studies examining the simultaneous effects of agricultural management practices and OM inputs on soil microorganisms, non-CO 2 GHG emissions, and SOC are scarce. Standardized studies across Europe’s diverse pedoclimatic regions would be valuable for assessing the benefits of OM inputs in agricultural soils. This would enable the identification of region-specific solutions that enhance soil health, prevent degradation, and support sustainable and productive farming systems.
Suggested Citation
Arianna Latini & Luciana Di Gregorio & Elena Valkama & Manuela Costanzo & Peter Maenhout & Marjetka Suhadolc & Francesco Vitali & Stefano Mocali & Alessandra Lagomarsino & Annamaria Bevivino, 2025.
"Do Soil Microbes Drive the Trade-Off Between C Sequestration and Non-CO 2 GHG Emissions in EU Agricultural Soils? A Systematic Review,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-33, December.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2025:i:1:p:319-:d:1828440
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2025:i:1:p:319-:d:1828440. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.