IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2025i1p318-d1828426.html

Sustainable Management of Organic Waste as Substrates in Constructed Wetlands: A Systematic Review

Author

Listed:
  • Diego Domínguez-Solís

    (Centro Interdisciplinario de Investigaciones y Estudios sobre Medio Ambiente y Desarrollo (CIIEMAD), Instituto Politécnico Nacional (IPN), Mexico City 07340, Mexico)

  • María Concepción Martínez-Rodríguez

    (Centro Interdisciplinario de Investigaciones y Estudios sobre Medio Ambiente y Desarrollo (CIIEMAD), Instituto Politécnico Nacional (IPN), Mexico City 07340, Mexico)

  • Lorena Elizabeth Campos-Villegas

    (Centro Interdisciplinario de Investigaciones y Estudios sobre Medio Ambiente y Desarrollo (CIIEMAD), Instituto Politécnico Nacional (IPN), Mexico City 07340, Mexico)

  • Héctor Guadalupe Ramírez-Escamilla

    (Centro Interdisciplinario de Investigaciones y Estudios sobre Medio Ambiente y Desarrollo (CIIEMAD), Instituto Politécnico Nacional (IPN), Mexico City 07340, Mexico)

  • Xochitl Virginia Bello-Yañez

    (Centro Interdisciplinario de Investigaciones y Estudios sobre Medio Ambiente y Desarrollo (CIIEMAD), Instituto Politécnico Nacional (IPN), Mexico City 07340, Mexico)

Abstract

Constructed wetlands (CWs), which combine biological and physicochemical processes and adhere to circular economy principles, are increasingly recognized as nature-based wastewater treatment solutions. With an emphasis on resource valorization and pollutant removal efficiency, this review assessed the use of organic residues as substrates in CWs. In total, 44 peer-reviewed open-access case studies in English were obtained from 325 documents that were retrieved from Scopus using PRISMA-based eligibility criteria. Information about the wastewater source, substrate, CW type, and results was extracted. The results indicated that biochar (66.7%) predominated because of its high adsorption capacity and microbial support, while shell or forest residues and agricultural residues (20.5%) helped remove micropollutants and phosphorus. CWs with vertical subsurface flow were most prevalent (54%). According to studies, the removal efficiencies of biochar and agricultural or shell residues were 10–15% higher than those of inorganic substrates for phosphorus, TSS (total suspended solids), NH 4 + (ammonium), and BOD (biochemical oxygen demand) in wastewater. Through innovative designs and the application of circular economy strategies, including revalorize, reuse, reutilize, reintegrate, rethink and reconnect, organic substrates enhance pollutant removal and improve the overall sustainability of CWs. Overall, CWs with organic residues provide cost-effective and environmentally sustainable wastewater treatment; further research on local resources, hybrid systems, and supportive policies is recommended to promote broader implementation.

Suggested Citation

  • Diego Domínguez-Solís & María Concepción Martínez-Rodríguez & Lorena Elizabeth Campos-Villegas & Héctor Guadalupe Ramírez-Escamilla & Xochitl Virginia Bello-Yañez, 2025. "Sustainable Management of Organic Waste as Substrates in Constructed Wetlands: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-21, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2025:i:1:p:318-:d:1828426
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/1/318/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/1/318/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2025:i:1:p:318-:d:1828426. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.