IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2025i1p317-d1828407.html

Resilience and Vulnerability to Sustainable Urban Innovation: A Comparative Analysis of Knowledge and Technology Networks in China

Author

Listed:
  • Jie Liu

    (Faculty of Education, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China
    School of Culture and Art, Chengdu University of Information Technology, Chengdu 610103, China)

  • Tianxing Zhu

    (Jinan University—University of Birmingham Joint Institute, Jinan University, Guangzhou 511443, China)

Abstract

This study examines the structural evolution of Knowledge Innovation Networks (KINs) and Technology Innovation Networks (TINs) across Chinese cities (2015–2024). Using SCI/SSCI co-authorship and prefecture-level patent data, we construct dual-layer networks and assess their resilience through metrics such as average clustering coefficient, path length, global efficiency, and largest-component ratio. Our framework clarifies how network structure, spatial proximity, and urban hierarchy jointly shape innovation dynamics and opportunity distribution. Three main findings emerge. First, KINs have moved toward polycentricity yet remain hierarchically rigid, with persistent core–periphery gaps despite improved connectivity in tier 2–4 cities. TINs show greater cross-tier adaptability, creating new innovation gateways while intensifying intra-tier polarization. Second, under simulated disruptions, KINs are vulnerable to targeted attacks and exhibit path-dependent degradation, whereas TINs maintain efficiency until a critical threshold, then collapse abruptly. Third, MRQAP analysis reveals that economic and geographic proximity facilitate collaboration in KIN but constrain linkages in TINs, with spatial proximity exerting a stronger influence on knowledge flows. These results demonstrate how innovation networks mediate urban–rural interactions, affect spatial inequality, and shape regional resilience. We argue for differentiated policies that strengthen core–periphery connectivity while mitigating proximity-induced lock-in, fostering more inclusive, resilient, and sustainable urban innovation systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Jie Liu & Tianxing Zhu, 2025. "Resilience and Vulnerability to Sustainable Urban Innovation: A Comparative Analysis of Knowledge and Technology Networks in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-30, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2025:i:1:p:317-:d:1828407
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/1/317/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/1/317/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2025:i:1:p:317-:d:1828407. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.