IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2025i1p308-d1828259.html

Nature-Based Solutions for Large-Scale Landslide Mitigation: A Review of Sustainable Approaches, Modeling Integration, and Future Perspectives

Author

Listed:
  • Yingqian Zhou

    (Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia)

  • Ahmad Fikri Abdullah

    (Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia
    International Institute of Aquaculture and Aquatic Sciences (I-AQUAS), Universiti Putra Malaysia, Lot 960 Jln Kemang 6, Port Dickson 71050, Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia)

  • Nurshahida Azreen Mohd Jais

    (International Institute of Aquaculture and Aquatic Sciences (I-AQUAS), Universiti Putra Malaysia, Lot 960 Jln Kemang 6, Port Dickson 71050, Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia)

  • Nur Atirah Muhadi

    (Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia)

  • Leng-Hsuan Tseng

    (IHE Delft Institute for Water Education, Westvest 7, 2611 AX Delft, The Netherlands)

  • Zoran Vojinovic

    (IHE Delft Institute for Water Education, Westvest 7, 2611 AX Delft, The Netherlands)

  • Aimrun Wayayok

    (Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia)

Abstract

Landslides rank among the most frequent and devastating natural hazards globally, causing significant loss of life and property. As a result, landslide susceptibility assessment has become a central focus in geohazard research, which is devoted to preventing and alleviating the frequent occurrence of landslides. Numerous analytical models have been applied to evaluate landslide susceptibility, including Frequency Ratio (FR), Logistic Regression (LR), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest (RF), and various hybrid and neural network-based approaches. This review synthesizes current progress in integrating Nature-based Solutions (NBS) with modeling and policy frameworks, highlighting their potential to provide cost-effective, sustainable, and adaptive alternatives to conventional landslide mitigation strategies. Based on a systematic review of 127 peer-reviewed publications published between 2023 and 2025, selected from Web of Science, ScienceDirect, MDPI, Springer, and Google Scholar using predefined keywords and screening criteria, this study reveals that the most frequently used conditioning factors in landslide susceptibility modeling are slope (96 times), aspect (77 times), elevation (77 times), and lithology (77 times). Among modeling approaches, Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM), hybrid models, and neural network models consistently demonstrate high predictive performance. Despite the expanding body of literature on NBS, only 2.3% of all NBS-related studies specifically address landslide mitigation. The existing literature primarily concentrates on assessing the biophysical effectiveness of interventions such as vegetation cover, root reinforcement, and forest-based stabilization using a range of predictive modeling techniques. However, significant gaps remain in the integration of economic valuation frameworks, particularly cost–benefit analysis (CBA), to quantify the monetary value of NBS interventions in landslide risk reduction. This highlights a critical area for future research to support evidence-based decision-making and sustainable risk governance.

Suggested Citation

  • Yingqian Zhou & Ahmad Fikri Abdullah & Nurshahida Azreen Mohd Jais & Nur Atirah Muhadi & Leng-Hsuan Tseng & Zoran Vojinovic & Aimrun Wayayok, 2025. "Nature-Based Solutions for Large-Scale Landslide Mitigation: A Review of Sustainable Approaches, Modeling Integration, and Future Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-37, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2025:i:1:p:308-:d:1828259
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/1/308/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/1/308/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2025:i:1:p:308-:d:1828259. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.