Author
Listed:
- Marzhan S. Kalmakhanova
(Department of Chemistry and Chemical Technology, M. Kh. Dulaty Taraz University, Taraz 080012, Kazakhstan)
- Aidana U. Khabashova
(Department of Chemistry and Chemical Technology, M. Kh. Dulaty Taraz University, Taraz 080012, Kazakhstan)
- Aisha N. Nurlybayeva
(Department of Chemistry and Chemical Technology, M. Kh. Dulaty Taraz University, Taraz 080012, Kazakhstan)
- Seitzhan A. Orynbayev
(Department of Chemistry and Chemical Technology, M. Kh. Dulaty Taraz University, Taraz 080012, Kazakhstan)
- Helder T. Gomes
(CIMO, LA SusTEC, Instituto Politécnico de Bragança, Campus de Santa Apolónia, 5300-253 Bragança, Portugal)
- Daniel D. Snow
(Nebraska Water Center, Part of the Robert B. Daugherty Water for Food Global Institute, University of Nebraska, 2021 Transformation Drive, Lincoln, NE 68588-0844, USA)
Abstract
Pharmaceuticals such as paracetamol and diclofenac (DCF) are among the most extensively consumed drugs worldwide and are continuously released into municipal and hospital wastewater due to incomplete human metabolism. Their persistent presence in aquatic environments, typically ranging from ng/L to µg/L, raises concerns due to endocrine disruption, chronic toxicity, and the promotion of antimicrobial resistance. Conventional wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) remove 70–90% of ACT but less than 30% of DCF, primarily because these systems were not designed to target low-concentration, recalcitrant micropollutants. As a result, pharmaceuticals frequently pass into treated effluents, highlighting the need for advanced, sustainable, and passive treatment solutions. Permeable reactive barriers (PRBs) have emerged as a promising technology for the interception and removal of pharmaceuticals from both wastewater treatment plant effluents and groundwater. This review provides a comprehensive assessment of ACT and DCF occurrence, environmental behavior, and ecotoxicological risks, followed by a detailed evaluation of PRB performance using advanced reactive media such as geopolymers, activated carbon, carbon nanotubes, and hybrid composites. Reported removal efficiencies exceed 90% for ACT and 70–95% for DCF, depending on media composition and operating conditions. The primary removal mechanisms include adsorption, ion exchange, π–π interactions, hydrogen bonding, and redox transformation. The novelty of this review lies in systematically synthesizing recent laboratory- and pilot-scale findings on PRBs for pharmaceutical removal, identifying critical knowledge gaps—including long-term field validation, media regeneration, and performance under realistic wastewater matrices—and outlining future research directions for scaling PRBs toward full-scale implementation. The study demonstrates that PRBs represent a viable and sustainable tertiary treatment option for reducing pharmaceutical loads in aquatic environments.
Suggested Citation
Marzhan S. Kalmakhanova & Aidana U. Khabashova & Aisha N. Nurlybayeva & Seitzhan A. Orynbayev & Helder T. Gomes & Daniel D. Snow, 2025.
"Use of Permeable Reactive Barriers in the Removal of ACT and DCF from Effluents of Wastewater Treatment Plants,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-37, December.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2025:i:1:p:300-:d:1827860
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2025:i:1:p:300-:d:1827860. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.