Author
Listed:
- Xiwen Zhou
(School of Finance and Economics, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212000, China)
- Haining Chen
(School of Finance and Economics, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212000, China)
- Guoping Ding
(School of Finance and Economics, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212000, China)
Abstract
In the macro context of promoting sustainable development and achieving net zero emissions, the role of green technology innovation, renewable energy utilization and environmental policy is crucial. However, there is still a lack of consistent empirical evidence regarding the combined emission reduction effect of these three factors in OECD countries. This study aims to empirically examine the combined impact of green technology innovation (GTI), renewable energy consumption (REC), and environmental taxes (ETAX) on carbon dioxide emissions. We expect that the former two will effectively reduce emissions, while the effect of environmental taxes depends on their design. Based on the panel data of 35 OECD economies from 1990 to 2019, this study adopts the augmented mean group (AMG) as the main estimation method, and uses the common correlation mean group (CCEMG) for the robustness test. To control potential endogenous issues, the difference generalized method of moments (GMM) is also employed for estimation. The causal relationship between variables is tested using the Dumitrescu–Herlin method. The results show that, as expected, GTI and REC have a significant negative impact on carbon dioxide reduction. However, ETAX is positively correlated with carbon emissions and does not have statistical significance, which deviates from the ideal policy effect and suggests that there may be efficiency bottlenecks in the current tax design. The causality test further reveals that there is a significant two-way causal relationship between CO 2 emissions and GTI, REC, ETAX, GDP, and fossil fuel consumption (FEC). Therefore, it is recommended that OECD countries give priority to expanding investment in green technologies and renewable energy infrastructure and re-evaluate and optimize environmental tax policies to effectively promote the transition to a low-carbon economy.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2025:i:1:p:221-:d:1826062. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.