Author
Listed:
- Zihe Tian
(College of Management Science, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China
The College of International Education (Oxford Brookes College), Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China)
- Liangwei Liu
(College of Management Science, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China
The College of International Education (Oxford Brookes College), Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China)
- Tian Xia
(College of Management Science, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China
The College of International Education (Oxford Brookes College), Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China)
Abstract
Under China’s “dual carbon” targets and deepening global climate governance, this paper investigates whether and how corporate green transformation (GTF) improves carbon performance (CP). Using panel data on Chinese A-share listed firms from 2008 to 2023 and multiple causal identification strategies (fixed effects, RD, DID and PSM), we find that GTF significantly enhances CP, with stronger marginal effects for firms with poorer initial carbon performance. Mechanism analyses show that carbon disclosure (CD) acts as a positive mediator in the GTF–CP nexus, whereas executives’ green perception (EGP) exerts a short-term suppressing effect. Policy analyses further indicate that the 2012 pilot emissions trading schemes and the 2021 national carbon market amplify the positive impact of GTF on CP, but local “compliance traps” around industry medians suggest strategic use of allowance trading. The study integrates EGP and CD into a cognition–disclosure framework linking GTF and CP and provides evidence on the emission-reduction effects of GTF under evolving carbon policies, with implications for carbon market design and corporate low-carbon governance.
Suggested Citation
Zihe Tian & Liangwei Liu & Tian Xia, 2025.
"Green Transformation and Carbon Performance: The Cognition–Disclosure Chain Under China’s Carbon Policy Reform,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-27, December.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2025:i:1:p:22-:d:1821979
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2025:i:1:p:22-:d:1821979. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.