IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2025i1p138-d1824182.html

Towards Sustainable Agriculture: Understanding Farmers’ Perspective on the Use of Bio-Based Fertilisers

Author

Listed:
  • Marzena Smol

    (Mineral and Energy Economy Research Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences, Wybickiego 7a str., 31-261 Cracow, Poland)

  • Magdalena Andrunik

    (Mineral and Energy Economy Research Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences, Wybickiego 7a str., 31-261 Cracow, Poland)

  • Paulina Marcinek

    (Mineral and Energy Economy Research Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences, Wybickiego 7a str., 31-261 Cracow, Poland)

Abstract

Bio-based fertilisers (BBFs), produced from various types of biological waste using different processing methods, have demonstrated encouraging levels of agronomic efficiency and environmental benefits, consistent with the principles of sustainable development (SD). Nevertheless, bringing these newly developed products to market remains difficult due to limited farmer awareness, perceived risks, and regulatory uncertainties. In this paper, we examine the attitudes, opinions, and awareness of farmers regarding the use of various BBFs in their fertilisation practices. We applied a survey research method, using the Paper and Pen Personal Interview (PAPI), and answers were collected by agricultural advisors. A questionnaire, consisting of open, closed, and Likert scale questions, focusing on general information about farmers, current practices regarding fertiliser use, and the determinants of fertiliser choice, was used. Descriptive statistics, cross-tabulations, chi-square tests, Cramer’s V coefficients, 95% confidence intervals, and McNemar’s test were used to analyse the data. This study was conducted in all 16 voivodeships in Poland, collecting a total of 800 responses. Factors influencing the negative or positive attitude of farmers toward this practice were identified. Currently, mineral fertilisers remain the dominant choice among Polish farmers due to their accessibility, cost-effectiveness, and agronomic performance. There is observed growing, albeit cautious, interest in alternative fertilisation strategies and the correct understanding of sustainable agriculture practices. About half of farmers expressed willingness to partially replace mineral fertilisers with organic options, but only a minority showed interest in adopting BBFs. The findings indicate that concerns about contaminants, heterogeneous quality, limited availability, and regulatory uncertainty continue to constrain interest in BBFs. Although respondents recognised potential environmental benefits, economic and agronomic considerations remained the primary drivers of decision-making. As the survey was conducted in late 2021, the results reflect pre-2022 market conditions and should be interpreted as a baseline rather than a direct indication of current attitudes. Overall, this study provides insights into behavioural and structural factors influencing fertiliser use in Poland and highlights areas where further policy, advisory, and market developments may help support more sustainable nutrient management.

Suggested Citation

  • Marzena Smol & Magdalena Andrunik & Paulina Marcinek, 2025. "Towards Sustainable Agriculture: Understanding Farmers’ Perspective on the Use of Bio-Based Fertilisers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-21, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2025:i:1:p:138-:d:1824182
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/1/138/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/1/138/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2025:i:1:p:138-:d:1824182. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.