Air Emissions from Municipal Solid Waste Management: Comparing Landfilling, Incineration, and Composting

Background: Municipal solid waste management is a relevant component of climate and air quality policy, yet published life cycle assessments report inconsistent conclusions on whether sanitary landfilling, waste-to-energy incineration, composting, or anaerobic digestion yields the lowest greenhouse gas and co-pollutant impacts because results depend strongly on methodological choices and local context. Objective: To synthesize and critically evaluate how key life cycle assessment assumptions and boundary decisions influence reported emissions across major waste management pathways, with primary emphasis on the United States and selected comparison to European Union policy frameworks. Methods: Peer-reviewed life cycle assessment studies and supporting technical and regulatory sources were reviewed and compared, focusing on functional unit definition, system boundaries, time horizon, energy substitution and crediting methods, and treatment of methane, nitrous oxide, and air pollutant controls; drivers of variability were identified through structured cross study comparison and sensitivity-focused interpretation. Results: Reported pathway rankings vary primarily with landfill gas collection and utilization assumptions, the carbon intensity of displaced electricity or heat for waste-to-energy systems, and the representation of biological process emissions across active and curing stages; harmonized comparisons reduce variability but do not yield a single consistently superior pathway across all plausible settings. Conclusions: Comparative conclusions are context-dependent and policy-relevant interpretation requires transparent reporting and sensitivity analysis for capturing efficiency, substitution factors, and biological emission controls, along with clear alignment between modeled scenarios and real-world operating conditions.