Author
Listed:
- Wenzheng Wu
(Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China
College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
China Key Laboratory of Environmental Biotechnology, Yangtze River Delta Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Yiwu 322000, China)
- Maihaiti Mairemu
(Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China
College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)
- Xiaoxu Zheng
(Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China
College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)
- Yanghui Xiong
(China Key Laboratory of Environmental Biotechnology, Yangtze River Delta Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Yiwu 322000, China)
- Shengjun Xu
(Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China
College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)
- Cancan Jiang
(Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China
College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)
- Xupo Zhang
(Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China
College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)
- Jinglin Wang
(Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China
College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)
- Xiaoxuan Liu
(Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China)
- Xuliang Zhuang
(Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China
College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China)
Abstract
Quantifying the variation in wetland greenhouse gas fluxes across large spatial scales and accurately assessing source–sink effects is crucial. However, there remains a limited understanding of the combined impacts of influent COD/N ratios and geographical distribution conditions on pollutant removal and GHG emissions. In this study, five typical constructed wetlands from across the country were selected to evaluate GHG emissions, pollutant removal efficiencies, and the main influencing factors for each wetland. The results showed that temperature, ammonia nitrogen concentration, COD, COD/N ratio, and geographical location were the main regulators of GHG emissions, with complex interactions among the factors. Overall, GHG emissions were higher in the coastal region than in the inland region, highlighting the importance of geographic distribution conditions on wetland operation. In addition, wetlands with a COD/N of 3 showed the best overall performance in terms of pollutant removal and GHG emission reduction. Moreover, COD/N had an important effect on the emission fluxes of all three greenhouse gases, which was an important influencing factor on the emission fluxes of greenhouse gases from constructed wetlands. Wetlands with lower COD/N ratios, especially coastal wetlands, showed stronger performance in pollutant removal and GHG emission reduction. This study emphasizes the need to fully consider the potential influence of influent COD/N ratio on GHG emissions when designing constructed wetlands for municipal wastewater treatment, providing valuable insights for future wetland design and GHG abatement strategies.
Suggested Citation
Wenzheng Wu & Maihaiti Mairemu & Xiaoxu Zheng & Yanghui Xiong & Shengjun Xu & Cancan Jiang & Xupo Zhang & Jinglin Wang & Xiaoxuan Liu & Xuliang Zhuang, 2025.
"Efficient Pollutant Removal and Low-Carbon Emission Mechanisms in Constructed Wetlands Synergistically Driven by Low COD/N Ratio and Coastal Location,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-19, May.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:9:p:4168-:d:1649536
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:9:p:4168-:d:1649536. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.