IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i9p3904-d1642990.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring the Urban Greening Community in Jakarta’s Urban Kampung: A Tactical Urbanism Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Husnul Fitri

    (Urban Studies Department, School of Strategic and Global Studies, Universitas Indonesia, Depok 16424, Indonesia)

  • Annisa Ananda Sari

    (Urban Studies Department, School of Strategic and Global Studies, Universitas Indonesia, Depok 16424, Indonesia)

Abstract

This study examines the urban greening community movement through the lens of tactical urbanism as a community-based urban planning model. Tactical urbanism, gaining traction as both a response and an alternative to urban challenges, is defined by active community participation. This approach challenges traditional top-down planning by offering swift, adaptive, and creative solutions tailored to community needs. By fostering participatory planning, tactical urbanism enhances collective awareness and empowers communities to drive development and address urban issues. The emphasis on grassroots involvement ensures a more inclusive and effective planning process. Despite its potential, tactical urbanism remains under explored within Indonesia’s planning framework. This study analyzes the tactical urbanism process in urban greening communities in Jakarta’s urban kampung, exploring whether tactical urbanism serves as a steppingstone to achieving more strategic long-term goals and examining the role of stakeholders outside the community in this process. In-depth interviews with key members of three urban greening communities and thematic data analysis reveal several key findings: the greening movement is primarily driven by personal initiatives; the formalization of community structures plays a crucial role; government and private sector involvement influences the process of maintaining urban greening community’s needs; empowerment and behavioral changes occur within the community; and organizational sustainability remains a key challenge. Based on the findings, it proposes an “organic tactical urbanism” framework as a practical guide for addressing urban challenges in various contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • Husnul Fitri & Annisa Ananda Sari, 2025. "Exploring the Urban Greening Community in Jakarta’s Urban Kampung: A Tactical Urbanism Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-22, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:9:p:3904-:d:1642990
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/9/3904/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/9/3904/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nitin Sawhney & Christo de Klerk & Shriya Malhotra, 2015. "Civic Engagement through DIY Urbanism and Collective Networked Action," Planning Practice & Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(3), pages 337-354, June.
    2. David Webb, 2018. "Tactical Urbanism: Delineating a Critical Praxis," Planning Theory & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(1), pages 58-73, January.
    3. Suzanne Vallance & Sarah Edwards, 2021. "Charting New Ground: Between Tactical Urbanism and Strategic Spatial Planning," Planning Theory & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(5), pages 707-724, October.
    4. Yi-Ya Hsu & Scott Hawken & Samad Sepasgozar & Zih-Hong Lin, 2022. "Beyond the Backyard: GIS Analysis of Public Green Space Accessibility in Australian Metropolitan Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-25, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jaecheol Kim & Hyun-Young Jin, 2023. "Interpreting Tactical Urbanism through Innovation–Diffusion Theory: Insights from a Collaborative Design Studio Experience," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-19, December.
    2. Devon McAslan & Farah Najar Arevalo & David A. King & Thaddeus R. Miller, 2021. "Pilot project purgatory? Assessing automated vehicle pilot projects in U.S. cities," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-16, December.
    3. Zihe Wang & Gege Yan & Siyuan Wang, 2022. "Fairness Evaluation of Landscape Justice in Urban Park Green Space: A Case Study of the Daxing Part of Yizhuang New Town, Beijing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-18, December.
    4. Ersilia Verlinghieri & Elisabetta Vitale Brovarone & Luca Staricco, 2024. "The conflictual governance of street experiments, between austerity and post-politics," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 61(5), pages 878-899, April.
    5. Brenda B. Lin & Susan Thompson & Richard Mitchell & Thomas Astell-Burt & Evelyne De Leeuw & Bin Jalaludin & Xiaoqi Feng, 2023. "Policymaker and Practitioner Perceptions of Parks for Health and Wellbeing: Scoping a Holistic Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-16, March.
    6. Inés Aquilué & Angélica Caicedo & Joan Moreno & Miquel Estrada & Laia Pagès, 2021. "A Methodology for Assessing the Impact of Living Labs on Urban Design: The Case of the Furnish Project," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-29, April.
    7. Sanja Seljan & Marina Viličić & Zvonimir Nevistić & Luka Dedić & Marina Grubišić & Iva Cibilić & Karlo Kević & Bastiaan van Loenen & Frederika Welle Donker & Charalampos Alexopoulos, 2022. "Open Data as a Condition for Smart Application Development: Assessing Access to Hospitals in Croatian Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-25, September.
    8. Jouni Häkli & Kirsi Pauliina Kallio & Olli Ruokolainen, 2020. "A Missing Citizen? Issue Based Citizenship in City‐Regional Planning," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(5), pages 876-893, September.
    9. Kwiatkowski Michał Adam, 2024. "Bicycle critical mass events 30 years on – are they an urban mobility movement or a bicycle festival?," Environmental & Socio-economic Studies, Sciendo, vol. 12(2), pages 28-39.
    10. Merlijn Van Hulst & Catherine Durose & Annika Agger, 2024. "HOW LOCAL PRACTICES OF SOCIOPOLITICAL INNOVATION DEVELOP: And Why This Matters for Urban Transformations," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(4), pages 585-602, July.
    11. Xiaoran Huang & Pixin Gong & Marcus White, 2022. "Study on Spatial Distribution Equilibrium of Elderly Care Facilities in Downtown Shanghai," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-17, June.
    12. Emilio Ramírez-Juidías & José-Lázaro Amaro-Mellado & Jorge Luis Leiva-Piedra, 2022. "Influence of the Urban Green Spaces of Seville (Spain) on Housing Prices through the Hedonic Assessment Methodology and Geospatial Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-15, December.
    13. Kaihang Zhou & Scott Hawken, 2023. "Climate-Related Sea Level Rise and Coastal Wastewater Treatment Infrastructure Futures: Landscape Planning Scenarios for Negotiating Risks and Opportunities in Australian Urban Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-23, June.
    14. Raisa Sultana & Scott Hawken, 2023. "Reconciling Nature-Technology-Child Connections: Smart Cities and the Necessity of a New Paradigm of Nature-Sensitive Technologies for Today’s Children," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-19, April.
    15. Ziqian Bao & Yihang Bai & Tao Geng, 2023. "Examining Spatial Inequalities in Public Green Space Accessibility: A Focus on Disadvantaged Groups in England," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-22, September.
    16. Yusheng Yang & Shuoning Tang, 2025. "Examining Residents’ Perceptions and Usage Preferences of Urban Public Green Spaces Through the Lens of Environmental Justice," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-24, March.
    17. Wudong Zhao & Liwei Zhang & Xupu Li & Lixian Peng & Pengtao Wang & Zhuangzhuang Wang & Lei Jiao & Hao Wang, 2022. "Residents’ Preference for Urban Green Space Types and Their Ecological-Social Services in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-20, December.
    18. Won-Ji Kim & Tae-Kyung Lee, 2022. "Greenness Index and Preferences for Interior Landscapes in Residential Spaces," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-14, April.
    19. Yang Ye & Yuhan Yang, 2023. "A Review of Research on Urban Playability from a Social Justice Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-18, May.
    20. Violante Torre, 2024. "Re-learning culture in cities beyond the West," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 61(13), pages 2531-2547, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:9:p:3904-:d:1642990. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.