IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i9p3820-d1641013.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of Green Development Dynamics and Influencing Factors in Daihai Basin

Author

Listed:
  • Bin Bin

    (School of Economics and Finance, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China)

  • Weijia Cao

    (School of Ecology and Environment, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot 010021, China)

  • Qingkang Yang

    (School of Ecology and Environment, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot 010021, China)

  • Jinlei Li

    (School of Ecology and Environment, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot 010021, China)

  • Shizhong Jiang

    (School of Earth System Science, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China)

  • Xiaoye Cao

    (School of Ecology and Environment, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot 010021, China)

Abstract

Green development accounting provides the theoretical basis and data support for national or regional ecological civilization constructions. The Daihai Basin, located in Ulanqab City, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, is not only an important ecological barrier in the region but also one of the 179 nationally important wetlands under the “China Wetland Conservation Action Plan”. It plays a crucial role in maintaining regional ecological balance, providing ecological services such as water conservation, climate regulation, and biodiversity protection. Taking Daihai Basin as the study area, an accounting system of Green Gross Domestic Product (GGDP), Gross Ecosystem Product (GEP), and Gross Economic–Ecological Product (GEEP) was constructed to explore the temporal variation characteristics of GGDP, GEP, and GEEP in the study area from 1989 to 2022. The results were as follows: (1) During the study period, the overall GGDP in Daihai Basin showed an increasing trend, with an increase of CNY 3.812 billion in the past 30 years, of which GGDP increased from 1989 to 2011 and decreased from 2011 to 2022. In addition to GDP, the ecological damage cost was the most important factor influencing GGDP in the Daihai Basin, and the most significant one is the ecological damage to the wetland. (2) The GEP in the study area decreased, with a decrease of CNY 1.066 billion in the past 30 years. However, the conversion value of “Two Mountains” increased year by year. During the study period, the ecological regulation service value, which was dominated by climate regulation and water conservation, decreased year by year. (3) The GEEP in the study area showed a fluctuating change, with an overall upward trend, reaching a maximum of CNY 9.011 billion in 2011. (4) Except for 2011, during the study period, GEEP > GEP > GGDP in Daihai Basin, but the main driving factors of the three indicators were different, and the variation trends with time were different. The results of this research can provide a decision-making basis for the high-quality development of the Daihai Basin and provide reference cases for the green development accounting of other basins.

Suggested Citation

  • Bin Bin & Weijia Cao & Qingkang Yang & Jinlei Li & Shizhong Jiang & Xiaoye Cao, 2025. "Analysis of Green Development Dynamics and Influencing Factors in Daihai Basin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-16, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:9:p:3820-:d:1641013
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/9/3820/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/9/3820/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:9:p:3820-:d:1641013. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.