Author
Listed:
- Miroslava Rakočević
(Embrapa Meio Ambiente, Jaguariúna 13820–000, SP, Brazil)
- Eunice Reis Batista
(Embrapa Meio Ambiente, Jaguariúna 13820–000, SP, Brazil)
- Fabio Takeshi Matsunaga
(Campus Londrina, UniSENAI PR, Londrina 86062-030, PR, Brazil)
- Maria Brígida dos Santos Scholz
(Instituto Agronômico do Paraná, Londrina 86047–902, PR, Brazil)
Abstract
Gibberellic acid (GA3) may help to synchronize coffee flowering, whilst ethylene (in the form of Ethephon) may assist in advancing coffee berry maturation even when applied in the pre-flowering stage of phenophase. Functional–structural plant modeling (FSPM) can be used to help understand whole-plant responses, such as plant-scale photosynthesis. FSPM has never been used to investigate the response of coffee plants to external plant growth regulator (PGR) applications. We hypothesized that treatment with PGRs at the beginning of berry maturation (BM) during phenophase could (1) influence plant leaf area and plant photosynthesis at the end of BM and (2) assist in the uniformity of the berry maturation of seven-year-old coffee plants. Additionally, we assumed that (3) the distribution of berries over the vertical plant profile could be related to the coffee beans’ chemical quality, and that irrigated plants would have delayed maturation, but a higher yield than non-irrigated (NI) plants. To test these hypotheses, a short sustainable period of irrigation was applied six weeks before harvest. Irrigated plants were treated with GA3 or Ethephon. A combination of field measurements (leaf gas exchanges, berry collection and bean chemical analyses in relation to vertical plant strata) and computer modeling were used. At the beginning or the end of BM, coffee trees were coded using the VPlants modeling platform and reconstructed using CoffePlant3D software to compute the plant leaf area and plant photosynthesis. The greatest number of second-order red berries were found in the upper stratum, S3 (>160 cm), while slightly fewer were found in S2 (80–160 cm) belonging to the third-order axes, and the lowest number was found in S1 (<80 cm). Green berries were more representative in S2, with the greatest number belonging to the third-order axes. The participation of third-order axes in berry yield was up to approximately 37% for red berries and 25% for green berries. The greatest separation between PGRs could be seen in S2, where more berries in the Ethephon-treated plants were found than in the GA3 treated ones, while the dry mass (DM) percentage was higher in GA3 than in the Ethephon treatment. The percentage of DM in fresh mass was 17–28% in the green berries and 28–36% in the red berries. PGRs were important for homogenous berry maturity, especially GA3, which also showed the lowest total chlorogenic acid content. The NI plants showed reduced red and total berry production when compared to irrigated ones, indicating this horticultural measure is important, even during a sustainably reduced six-week period, due to preserved leaf area and plant photosynthesis, and it also increased the lipid and kahweol contents of irrigated plants when compared to NI plants, despite the maturation delay.
Suggested Citation
Miroslava Rakočević & Eunice Reis Batista & Fabio Takeshi Matsunaga & Maria Brígida dos Santos Scholz, 2025.
"Plant Growth Regulators and Short-Term Irrigation for Berry Maturation Homogeneity and Increased Coffea arabica Bean Quality,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-23, April.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:9:p:3803-:d:1640642
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:9:p:3803-:d:1640642. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.