IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i9p3779-d1639969.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Machine-Learning-Based Ensemble Prediction of the Snow Water Equivalent in the Upper Yalong River Basin

Author

Listed:
  • Jujia Zhang

    (Department of Water Resources, China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, Beijing 100038, China)

  • Mingxiang Yang

    (Department of Water Resources, China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, Beijing 100038, China)

  • Ningpeng Dong

    (Department of Water Resources, China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, Beijing 100038, China)

  • Yicheng Wang

    (Department of Water Resources, China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, Beijing 100038, China)

Abstract

The snow water equivalent (SWE) in high-altitude regions is crucial for water resource management and disaster risk reduction, yet accurate predictions remain challenging due to complex snowmelt processes, nonlinear meteorological factors, and time-lag effects. This study used snow remote sensing products from the Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer (AMSR) as the predictand for evaluating SWE predictions. It applied nine machine learning models—linear regression (LR), decision trees (DT), support vector regression (SVR), random forest (RF), artificial neural networks (ANNs), AdaBoost, XGBoost, gradient boosting decision trees (GBDT), and CatBoost. For each machine learning model, submodels were constructed to predict the SWE for the next 1 to 30 days. The 30 submodels of each machine learning model formed the prediction model for the snow water equivalent over the next 30 days. Through an accuracy evaluation and ensemble forecasting, the snow water equivalent prediction for the next 30 days in the Yalong River above the Ganzi Basin was finally achieved. The results showed that for all models, the average Nash–Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE) rate was greater than 0.8, the average root mean square error (RMSE) was under 8 mm, and the average relative error (RE) was below 7% across three lead time periods (1–10, 11–20, and 21–30 days). The ensemble average model, combining ANNs, GBDT, and CatBoost, demonstrated superior accuracy, with NSE values exceeding 0.85 and RMSE values under 6 mm. A sensitivity analysis using the Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) model revealed that temperature variables (average, minimum, and maximum temperatures) were the most influential factors, while relative humidity (Rhu) significantly affected the SWE by reducing evaporation. These findings provide insights for improving SWE prediction accuracy and support water resource management in high-altitude regions.

Suggested Citation

  • Jujia Zhang & Mingxiang Yang & Ningpeng Dong & Yicheng Wang, 2025. "Machine-Learning-Based Ensemble Prediction of the Snow Water Equivalent in the Upper Yalong River Basin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-23, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:9:p:3779-:d:1639969
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/9/3779/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/9/3779/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wu Bo & Kunming Zhao & Gang Cheng & Yaping Wang & Jiazhe Zhang & Mingkai Cheng & Can Yang & Wa Da, 2024. "Study on Transportation Carbon Emissions in Tibet: Measurement, Prediction Model Development, and Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-26, September.
    2. Gang Zhou & Manyi Cui & Junhong Wan & Shiqiang Zhang, 2021. "A Review on Snowmelt Models: Progress and Prospect," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-27, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Miao Yu & Nadezhda Pavlova & Changlei Dai & Xianfeng Guo & Xiaohong Zhang & Shuai Gao & Yiru Wei, 2023. "Simulation and Analysis of the Dynamic Characteristics of Groundwater in Taliks in the Eruu Area, Central Yakutia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-17, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:9:p:3779-:d:1639969. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.