IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i8p3533-d1635015.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Novel Method for Estimating Soil Organic Carbon Density Using Soil Organic Carbon and Gravel Content Data

Author

Listed:
  • Jiawen Fan

    (School of Geographic Sciences, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing 210044, China)

  • Guanghui Zheng

    (School of Geographic Sciences, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing 210044, China)

  • Caixia Jiao

    (School of Geographic Sciences, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing 210044, China)

  • Rong Zeng

    (School of Geographic Sciences, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing 210044, China)

  • Yujie Zhou

    (School of Geographic Sciences, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing 210044, China)

  • Yan Wang

    (School of Geographic Sciences, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing 210044, China)

  • Mingxing Xu

    (Zhejiang Institute of Geological Survey, Hangzhou 311203, China)

  • Chengyi Zhao

    (School of Geographic Sciences, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing 210044, China)

Abstract

Soil organic carbon density (SOCD) is crucial for assessing soil organic carbon (SOC) storage, but its estimation remains challenging when bulk density (BD) data are unavailable. Traditional methods for substituting missing BD data, including using the mean, median, and pedotransfer functions (PTFs), introduce varying degrees of uncertainty in SOCD estimation: (1) The mean and median methods ignore the effects of soil type, environmental conditions, and land use changes on BD. They also heavily rely on the representativeness of soil samples, which may lead to systematic bias. (2) The accuracy of PTFs depends on modeling approaches, variable selection, and dataset characteristics, and differences among PTFs may introduce estimation biases in SOCD. To overcome this challenge, we analyzed 443 soil profiles from the Yangtze River Delta region of China and developed an innovative approach that estimates SOCD using only SOC and gravel content data. By formulating linear, polynomial, and power function regression models, we directly estimated SOCD per centimeter of soil horizon i (SOCD icm ) under conditions with and without available gravel content data, followed by SOCD calculation. The results indicated a strong correlation between SOC and SOCD icm , with the three function models for direct SOC-based SOCD icm estimation yielding consistently high accuracy. Neglecting gravel content overall resulted in the overestimation of SOCD icm by 7.01–9.45%. After incorporating gravel content as a correction factor, the accuracy of the new method for estimating SOCD was improved, with the prediction set achieving R² values of 0.927–0.945, an RMSE of 0.819–0.949 kg m −2 , and an RPIQ of 4.773–5.533. The accuracy of estimating SOCD surpassed that of the BD mean and median methods and was comparable to that of the PTF method, thus enabling reliable SOCD estimation. This study introduces an innovative approach by developing regional models to estimate SOCD icm , enabling rapid SOCD estimation for samples with missing BD information in historical data, and provides a new methodology for calculating regional and global SOC stocks. This study contributes to improving the accuracy of soil carbon stock estimation, supporting land management and carbon cycle research, and providing scientific evidence for sustainable agricultural development and climate change mitigation strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiawen Fan & Guanghui Zheng & Caixia Jiao & Rong Zeng & Yujie Zhou & Yan Wang & Mingxing Xu & Chengyi Zhao, 2025. "A Novel Method for Estimating Soil Organic Carbon Density Using Soil Organic Carbon and Gravel Content Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-27, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:8:p:3533-:d:1635015
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/8/3533/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/8/3533/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:8:p:3533-:d:1635015. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.