IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i8p3347-d1631183.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The “Algorithmic Gatekeeper”: How Dutch Farmers’ Use of YouTube Curates Their Views on the Nitrogen Crisis

Author

Listed:
  • Marc Esteve-del-Valle

    (Research Centre for Media and Journalism Studies, University of Groningen, 9747 AG Groningen, The Netherlands)

  • Fotini Anna Sarchosakis

    (Research Centre for Media and Journalism Studies, University of Groningen, 9747 AG Groningen, The Netherlands)

Abstract

Dutch farmers are turning to YouTube for insights into the nitrogen crisis. While the platform provides access to diverse information, its algorithmic structure—driven largely by economic interests—personalizes content delivery. This study explores Dutch farmers’ uses and gratifications in using YouTube, and how the YouTube algorithm affects their understanding of the nitrogen crisis. We conducted 12 semi-structured interviews with Dutch farmers and analyzed the data employing thematic analysis. Our findings reveal that farmers use YouTube to educate themselves, navigate laws and regulations, find support for their views, and seek diverse information sources. The platform helps farmers adapt to industry challenges, reinforce their beliefs, and stay informed about alternative perspectives. The study also uncovers the gatekeeping role of the YouTube algorithm, personalizing and curating content about the nitrogen crisis for the farmers.

Suggested Citation

  • Marc Esteve-del-Valle & Fotini Anna Sarchosakis, 2025. "The “Algorithmic Gatekeeper”: How Dutch Farmers’ Use of YouTube Curates Their Views on the Nitrogen Crisis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-25, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:8:p:3347-:d:1631183
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/8/3347/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/8/3347/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. W. Lance Bennett & Jarol B. Manheim, 2006. "The One-Step Flow of Communication," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 608(1), pages 213-232, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Brian Hughes & Cynthia Miller-Idriss & Rachael Piltch-Loeb & Beth Goldberg & Kesa White & Meili Criezis & Elena Savoia, 2021. "Development of a Codebook of Online Anti-Vaccination Rhetoric to Manage COVID-19 Vaccine Misinformation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-18, July.
    2. Jae Yeon Kim & Jaeung Sim & Daegon Cho, 2023. "Identity and Status: When Counterspeech Increases Hate Speech Reporting and Why," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 25(5), pages 1683-1694, October.
    3. Sangmi Chai & Bomi Choi & Minkyun Kim & T. C. E. Cheng, 2023. "Why do people speak about products online? The role of opinion leadership," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 1-17, March.
    4. Nick Couldry & Tim Markham, 2006. "Public Connection through Media Consumption: Between Oversocialization and De-Socialization?," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 608(1), pages 251-269, November.
    5. Jun Pang & Angela Xia Liu & Peter N. Golder, 2022. "Critics’ conformity to consumers in movie evaluation," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 50(4), pages 864-887, July.
    6. Giacomo Manetti & Carmela Nitti & Marco Bellucci, 2022. "The accountability of Search and Rescue NGOs," Working Papers - Business wp2022_02.rdf, Universita' degli Studi di Firenze, Dipartimento di Scienze per l'Economia e l'Impresa.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:8:p:3347-:d:1631183. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.