IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i7p2849-d1618704.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Vegetation Species Diversity and Dominance After Large-Scale Clear-Cutting: Case Study from Latvia

Author

Listed:
  • Diāna Jansone

    (Latvian State Forest Research Institute “Silava”, Rigas Street 111, LV-2169 Salaspils, Latvia)

  • Agnese Anta Liepiņa

    (Latvian State Forest Research Institute “Silava”, Rigas Street 111, LV-2169 Salaspils, Latvia)

  • Didzis Elferts

    (Latvian State Forest Research Institute “Silava”, Rigas Street 111, LV-2169 Salaspils, Latvia)

  • Āris Jansons

    (Latvian State Forest Research Institute “Silava”, Rigas Street 111, LV-2169 Salaspils, Latvia)

Abstract

Retention forestry is the dominant practice in Northern Europe, with large-scale clear-cuts following natural disturbances becoming more frequent as the climate changes. Despite its widespread use, clear-cutting is criticized for its potential adverse effects on species diversity and ecosystem recovery, particularly in understory vegetation. This study examines early vegetation changes after large-scale clear-cutting in Latvia’s hemiboreal forests. The sampling was conducted in 2017 and 2020, three and six years post-harvest, using 210 systematically placed plots (1 × 1 m) to assess species abundance and vegetation cover across moss/lichen, herbaceous, and shrub/tree layers. The findings indicate that species diversity was initially higher following clear-cutting but declined after six years, with the herbaceous layer most affected. While clear-cutting temporarily increases species diversity, negative effects become evident over time. Recovery is prolonged, with succession progressing faster in wet areas. To fully understand the long-term impacts of clear-cutting, continued monitoring is necessary.

Suggested Citation

  • Diāna Jansone & Agnese Anta Liepiņa & Didzis Elferts & Āris Jansons, 2025. "Vegetation Species Diversity and Dominance After Large-Scale Clear-Cutting: Case Study from Latvia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-10, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:7:p:2849-:d:1618704
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/7/2849/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/7/2849/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:7:p:2849-:d:1618704. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.