IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i24p11378-d1821312.html

Selection of Medical Waste Disposal Method for a University Hospital Using Hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods: A Case Study in Adana Province, Turkey

Author

Listed:
  • Olcay Kalan

    (Department of Industry Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Çukurova University, Balcalı, 01330 Adana, Turkey)

  • Zahide Figen Antmen

    (Department of Industry Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Çukurova University, Balcalı, 01330 Adana, Turkey)

  • Sıla Akbaba

    (Department of Industry Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Çukurova University, Balcalı, 01330 Adana, Turkey)

Abstract

The global expansion of healthcare services has made medical waste management an increasingly critical and complex issue. Medical wastes require specialized management due to their high infection risk, potential for environmental pollution, and adverse effects on public health. The correct collection, transportation, and final disposal are vital for protecting environmental health and ensuring the safety of hospital personnel and the community. Numerous disposal methods exist. Selecting the appropriate one, however, is a multi-dimensional decision-making problem, necessitating the simultaneous evaluation of various conflicting criteria. Adana, one of Turkey’s largest provinces, generates significant medical waste volumes due to its dense population and developed health infrastructure. Therefore, choosing the most suitable disposal method for hospitals in Adana is crucial for establishing an effective and sustainable waste management system. Making this decision using traditional methods is difficult. The multitude of criteria prevents any single method from being optimal across all aspects. This complexity mandates the use of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) methodologies. In this study, MCDM methods were applied, based on expert opinions, to select the disposal method at a university hospital in Adana. The research examined twelve criteria and four alternatives. The CRITIC (Criteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation) method was employed to objectively weigh the criteria. For the rigorous evaluation and ranking of the alternatives, three robust MCDM methods were utilized: PROMETHEE (Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment Evaluation), TOPSIS (Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution), and EDAS (Evaluation based on Distance from Average Solution). The final results conclusively identified incineration as the most appropriate disposal method for the hospital.

Suggested Citation

  • Olcay Kalan & Zahide Figen Antmen & Sıla Akbaba, 2025. "Selection of Medical Waste Disposal Method for a University Hospital Using Hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods: A Case Study in Adana Province, Turkey," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-34, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:24:p:11378-:d:1821312
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/24/11378/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/24/11378/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:24:p:11378-:d:1821312. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.