Author
Listed:
- Liang Li
(College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541006, China
Guangxi Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution Control Theory and Technology, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541006, China
University Engineering Research Center of Watershed Protection and Green Development, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541006, China
Key Laboratory of Carbon Emission and Pollutant Collaborative Control, Education Department of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541006, China)
- Haiping He
(College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541006, China
Guangxi Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution Control Theory and Technology, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541006, China
University Engineering Research Center of Watershed Protection and Green Development, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541006, China
Key Laboratory of Carbon Emission and Pollutant Collaborative Control, Education Department of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541006, China)
- Jiacai Li
(China Nonferrous Guilin Geology and Mining Research Institute Co., Ltd., Guilin 541000, China)
- Wenhai Wang
(College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541006, China
Guangxi Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution Control Theory and Technology, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541006, China
University Engineering Research Center of Watershed Protection and Green Development, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541006, China
Key Laboratory of Carbon Emission and Pollutant Collaborative Control, Education Department of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541006, China)
- Zhiwei Jiang
(College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541006, China
Guangxi Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution Control Theory and Technology, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541006, China
University Engineering Research Center of Watershed Protection and Green Development, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541006, China
Key Laboratory of Carbon Emission and Pollutant Collaborative Control, Education Department of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541006, China)
Abstract
The overuse of chemical fertilizers can result in elevated concentrations of nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) in soil, potentially impacting rock weathering processes and carbon flux in karst regions. This study analyzed the impacts of chicken dung fertilizer and compound fertilizer on the weathering of carbonate rocks within the water-soil-rock system, yielding the following results: (1) The peak concentrations of various ions in the compound fertilizer system (Ca 2+ : 36.8 mg/L, Mg 2+ : 4.3 mg/L, N: 284.2 mg/L, P: 920.6 mg/L, HCO 3 − : 16,170.3 mg/L) were generally superior to those in the chicken manure fertilizer system (15.4 mg/L, 1.9 mg/L, 306.9 mg/L, 27.9 mg/L, and 4576.5 mg/L, respectively), with a difference of approximately fourfold between the two systems; (2) Nitric acid generated by nitrification in fertilizers and phosphoric acid in compound fertilizers modify the chemical equilibrium of rock weathering, enhance dissolution, and influence the dynamics of HCO 3 − ; (3) Nitrogen and phosphorus in compound fertilizers are predominantly eliminated through ion exchange and adsorption. Calcium-phosphate precipitates are generated on the limestone surface within the 20 cm soil column, exhibiting a greater degree of weathering compared to the chicken manure fertilizer treatment; (4) analyses utilizing XRD, FT-IR, XPS, SEM, and additional approaches verified that substantial weathering and surface precipitation transpired on limestone throughout the 20 cm compound fertilizer column.
Suggested Citation
Liang Li & Haiping He & Jiacai Li & Wenhai Wang & Zhiwei Jiang, 2025.
"The Influence of Nitrogen and Phosphorus on Adsorption, Dissolution and Carbon Flux of Limestone Under Different Soil Layer Depths,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-23, December.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:24:p:11326-:d:1820200
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:24:p:11326-:d:1820200. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.