IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i24p11314-d1820036.html

Why Do Actions Speak Louder than Words? Unraveling the Cognition–Action Gap in Rural Environmental Governance

Author

Listed:
  • Jiangjun Wan

    (School of Architecture and Urban-Rural Planning, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China)

  • Kuntao Deng

    (School of Architecture and Urban-Rural Planning, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China)

  • Craig William Hutton

    (School of Geography and Environmental Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK)

  • Chenrui Zhou

    (School of Architecture and Urban-Rural Planning, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China)

  • Hongyu Wu

    (School of Architecture and Urban-Rural Planning, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China)

  • Xinrui Fan

    (School of Architecture and Urban-Rural Planning, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China)

  • Yi Su

    (Rural Development Research Institute, Sichuan Academy of Social Science, Chengdu 610071, China)

  • Jifei Zhang

    (Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu 610041, China)

  • Yanrong Yang

    (School of Economics and Business Administration, Yibin University, Yibin 644001, China)

  • Jinxiu Yang

    (College of Economics, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China)

Abstract

Against the backdrop of growing global environmental crises, achieving sustainability in rural areas—where economic development, ecological conservation, and social equity often intersect—has become increasingly urgent. Sustainable development theory stresses the need to turn environmental awareness into concrete action, yet in practice, a puzzling gap often remains, especially in developing contexts such as China. Why do rural residents sometimes engage in pro-environment behaviors even when their expressed awareness or willingness seems limited? To explore this question, we conducted a study in Li County, China, combining field research with regression and path analysis across three spatial dimensions: production, ecological, and living spaces. Our findings reveal a notable divergence: farmers’ environmental actions frequently surpass their cognitive understanding and stated willingness to participate in governance. This suggests that the influence of environmental cognition and participation willingness on behavior varies across different spatial contexts. We also find that household demographic and geographic attributes not only directly shape involvement in environmental governance but also mediate the relationship between cognition, willingness, and action. By untangling these complex linkages, our study offers a more nuanced understanding of rural environmental governance. We argue for governance approaches that are spatially sensitive and participatory, capable of accounting for the often non-linear pathways from perception to intent to behavior. The insights from Li County provide a valuable empirical basis for designing spatially differentiated and participatory governance policies. These findings are crucial for promoting effective environmental stewardship and achieving sustainable development goals in rural communities globally.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiangjun Wan & Kuntao Deng & Craig William Hutton & Chenrui Zhou & Hongyu Wu & Xinrui Fan & Yi Su & Jifei Zhang & Yanrong Yang & Jinxiu Yang, 2025. "Why Do Actions Speak Louder than Words? Unraveling the Cognition–Action Gap in Rural Environmental Governance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-23, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:24:p:11314-:d:1820036
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/24/11314/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/24/11314/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:24:p:11314-:d:1820036. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.