IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i24p11307-d1819978.html

Landslide Hazard Zonation Driven by Multi-Rainfall Scenarios Based on the Optimal XGBoost Model—A Case Study of Yongren County, Yunnan Province, China

Author

Listed:
  • Zhaoning Zeng

    (School of Earth Sciences, Yunnan University, Kunming 650500, China
    Yunnan International Joint Laboratory of Critical Mineral Resource, Kunming 650500, China)

  • Shucheng Tan

    (School of Earth Sciences, Yunnan University, Kunming 650500, China
    Yunnan International Joint Laboratory of Critical Mineral Resource, Kunming 650500, China)

  • Anqiang Li

    (School of Earth Sciences, Yunnan University, Kunming 650500, China
    Yunnan International Joint Laboratory of Critical Mineral Resource, Kunming 650500, China)

  • Yuanhui Ling

    (College of Environment and Civil Engineering, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China
    State Key Laboratory of Geohazard Prevention and Geoenvironment Protection, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China)

  • Weiyi Zhou

    (School of Earth Sciences, Yunnan University, Kunming 650500, China
    Yunnan International Joint Laboratory of Critical Mineral Resource, Kunming 650500, China)

Abstract

To address the limitations of low model accuracy and single-scenario settings in traditional rainfall-induced landslide hazard assessments, this study focuses on Yongren County, Yunnan Province—a region where landslides pose significant threats to sustainable socio-economic development and infrastructure resilience. Eight controlling factors—lithology, slope, terrain relief, distances to faults, rivers, and roads, vegetation coverage, and elevation—were used to build a landslide susceptibility index system. Three internationally recognized machine learning models, Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), were applied for comparison. The XGBoost model was further coupled with rainfall scenario analysis, simulating three rainfall scenarios—normal, 10-year, and 20-year return periods—to form a framework integrating “high-precision susceptibility prediction–multi-scenario rainfall driving–dynamic hazard assessment.” Results show that XGBoost achieved the highest accuracy and stability, with AUC and overall accuracy exceeding those of RF and SVM, supporting high-precision multi-scenario simulations. High-hazard zones expanded from road-disturbed areas under normal rainfall to riverbanks under 10-year rainfall and to fault-fracture and road–river interaction zones under 20-year rainfall. This study provides a transferable framework for sustainable landslide risk management, enabling precision prevention, optimizing resource allocation for disaster risk reduction, and supporting evidence-based policy-making for sustainable development and climate adaptation in similar geological settings.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhaoning Zeng & Shucheng Tan & Anqiang Li & Yuanhui Ling & Weiyi Zhou, 2025. "Landslide Hazard Zonation Driven by Multi-Rainfall Scenarios Based on the Optimal XGBoost Model—A Case Study of Yongren County, Yunnan Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-28, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:24:p:11307-:d:1819978
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/24/11307/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/24/11307/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:24:p:11307-:d:1819978. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.