IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i24p11278-d1819546.html

Modelling the Sustainable Development of the Ground Handling Process Using the PERT-COST Method

Author

Listed:
  • Artur Kierzkowski

    (Department of Technical Systems Operation and Maintenance, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, 27 Wybrzeże Wyspiańskiego Str., 50-370 Wroclaw, Poland)

  • Jacek Ryczyński

    (Department of Technical Systems Operation and Maintenance, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, 27 Wybrzeże Wyspiańskiego Str., 50-370 Wroclaw, Poland)

  • Tomasz Kisiel

    (Department of Technical Systems Operation and Maintenance, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, 27 Wybrzeże Wyspiańskiego Str., 50-370 Wroclaw, Poland)

  • Ewa Mardeusz

    (Department of Technical Systems Operation and Maintenance, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, 27 Wybrzeże Wyspiańskiego Str., 50-370 Wroclaw, Poland)

  • Olegas Prentkovskis

    (Department of Mobile Machinery and Railway Transport, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Plytinės g. 27, LT-10105 Vilnius, Lithuania)

Abstract

Aircraft turnaround efficiency is a key determinant of the sustainability of air transport systems. Each stage of ground handling—passenger disembarkation, baggage handling, refuelling, and ancillary services—contributes to the total turnaround time, with direct implications for airport capacity, operating costs, and environmental performance. Using empirical records from ground operations, the study characterizes the duration and variability of individual activities and identifies the main process bottlenecks. Building on this evidence, a comparative PERT-COST protocol with explicit threshold rules (quantized billing steps for selected resources) is developed and applied across predefined scenarios (remote versus gate, day versus night, low versus high fuel uplift, with versus without a second baggage team) under both linear and threshold cost models. The protocol aligns with ITS-enabled decision support by mapping stochastic activity times to cost-of-crashing functions and by providing harmonized performance metrics: final time T , total cost ∑ΔC, and efficiency η (EUR/min). The results show that moderate time reductions are attainable at reasonable cost, whereas aggressive targets that lie below the structural minimum are infeasible under current constraints; gate stands reduce the attainable minimum time but increase the marginal price near the minimum, and night operations raise costs without improving that minimum. These findings delineate the most productive intervention range and inform operational choices consistent with sustainability objectives.

Suggested Citation

  • Artur Kierzkowski & Jacek Ryczyński & Tomasz Kisiel & Ewa Mardeusz & Olegas Prentkovskis, 2025. "Modelling the Sustainable Development of the Ground Handling Process Using the PERT-COST Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-19, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:24:p:11278-:d:1819546
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/24/11278/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/24/11278/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:24:p:11278-:d:1819546. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.